Texas Supreme Court rejects Biden’s ‘treason abuse’ attempt to thwart election

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy updated at 1 p.m., along with a pro-Texas summary. WASHINGTON – In response to condemnations from four states, he is trying to thwart elections, with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton urging the U.S. Supreme Court to realize there is nowhere else in Texas. The fraud that led to the defeat of President Donald Trump must be addressed. Texas argued in the filing that “Texas did not ask this court to re-elect President Trump, and Texas did not seek to get the majority of defendants’ voters to vote.” Instead, “Texas is asking this court to recognize the obvious fact that in the 2020 election it was not possible to determine which candidate received the majority of the legal votes due to the mismanagement of the defendants.” The Supreme Court is expected to rule before the Electoral College on Monday to present a certificate to the winner of the presidential election, Joe Biden. Texas has effectively asked the court to overturn 10.4 million votes in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin, losing 62 electoral votes to Biden and recommending that the courts recognize the legislatures in those states – all controlled by Republicans to elect voters instead. Trump and half a dozen other states have asked for permission to join the Texas case. A total of 17 states, controlled by Republicans, have told the Supreme Court they support Texas’ cause. Less time for a verdict. The Electoral College convenes on December 14 after the presidential election. Trump topped Biden 306-232. When Congress votes whether to accept the Electoral College vote, it is the only time left. Four states trying to block Texas elections are overturning strong condemnations filed in the Supreme Court. “Texas’ attempt to elect this court next has no basis in law or, in fact, the president. On the other hand, 26 states, including Texas and its 17 allies, have filed lawsuits against Texas, including four states that are trying to thwart elections, and four of the 26 states have Republican governors, including Georgia. Did not deny it without further explanation, as this “extraordinary, dangerous president and his allies conspired with many states to steal the election of millions of supporters.” “The moment for our democracy” to believe that the projects have taken place. “If that vision continues to hold, it threatens not only our national politics for the next four years, but the fundamental confidence of the public in all kinds of elections that are the foundation of our society,” Goldstein wrote. “A simple five pages to a curium opinion will end honestly with the most important judgments of all time in American history.” Sen. Ted Cruz, who has argued nine cases in the Supreme Court and served as state attorney or chief appeals attorney before the 2012 election, agreed to Trump’s request to hear this or any other case, but many senior GOP lawmakers distanced themselves from the legal attack. John Corn, a senior senator from Texas who is a former state attorney general and a Texas Supreme Court judge, called these impacts “intimidating,” saying that states and other states could challenge Texas’ gun laws and other state laws and regulations if they were allowed to challenge Texas in other elections. South Dakota Senate Republican Whip John Dune broadcast similar concerns. “I do not know why a state like Texas does not want anyone to tell me what to do. Now he wants to tell me how to conduct elections in other states. I doubt the Supreme Court will take it,” he told The Hill. On Friday, 126 House Republicans signed an amicus summary in support of the Texas case, which included a dozen Texans and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and second-rate GOP legislator, Louisiana Minority Whip Steve Schulis. Biden received 7 million more votes nationally than Trump. Trump has insisted the election was rigged or stolen. In the run-up to Election Day and in response to the Govt-19 epidemic, he warned that the widespread use of the postal ballot created an opportunity for massive fraud. But three dozen state and federal courts have dismissed his legal panel’s allegations as baseless, with four states targeted by Texas arguing that Texas was too late – a legal theory called “lach”. If there was a formal complaint about their practices, it should have come before election day, the effect of which is not yet clear. In fact, Trump had already boasted that he would win all of those states. In a response filed Friday, Texas argued that the motive for the fraud and misconduct was not clear before Election Day: “The campaign to remove the state’s legal voting integrity rules has taken weeks in Texas to find fault, look for witnesses who are willing to speak, and look for credible evidence. “The main allegation in Texas is that governors or courts in four states have seized legislative control over the election of the president. Voters. Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat, denied the request and filed with a friend of the court, arguing that it was illegal for legislatures to enforce laws on governors. The Conservative group Citizens United argued in its own summary: “Defendant states may interfere in Texas and intermediate states opposing the internal election procedures of the Defendant’s states, but they are wrong.” All of the half-dozen states that want to join Texas as a plaintiff include the Missouri-led Republican Attorney General and Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Utah. Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and West Virginia also filed a brief petition supporting Texas’ cause. Some Republicans have blamed Texas’ efforts on House Amigas.Rep. Austin Conservative Chip Roy, who has served as the No. 2 attorney general in the Texas Attorney General’s Office for two years, refused to sign the House GOP summary, calling Texas’ case a “grave violation of the federal system,” which would lead states to ask the federal government to “vote for another state’s vote.” Sen. Ben Sass, a Republican from Nebraska, predicted that the Supreme Court would dismiss the case, citing the fact that the Foxconn FBI is under investigation. Former senior staff have accused Paxton of abusing his office to help a campaign donor. “In short, an apology is like filing a PR stunt instead of a lawsuit – because all of its claims have already been rejected by the federal courts and have not been signed by Texas’ own solicitor general,” Chass said in a statement. He told KXAN-TV in Austin, Paxton, that he had not discussed the possibility of an apology with Trump. He has been indicted for more than five years on state charges involving bond fraud, although presidents can only pardon federal crimes. Sass also noted that Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who works for Paxton, was not involved in the filing. This is so unusual that his work makes him the state’s attorney general before the U.S. Supreme Court, and suggests that he does not agree with the legal principle behind this case, although he and Paxton will not discuss it. Trump, who was co-chair of the prosecution for the re-election campaign of the Paxton president, filed the lawsuit Monday night. Constitutional scholars and electoral jurists consider the arguments to be foreign. “The novel and visionary claims that Texas emphasizes, and the breathtaking solutions it seeks, the legal principles and the unmanageable – Georgia’s filing. “This Court has never allowed one state to co-operate with the legislative powers of another State.” Republicans serve as governor, secretary of state, and attorney general in Georgia. Everyone defended the accuracy of the vote count and the calculations that Biden showed victory. Electoral procedures are controlled by the state. Five weeks after Election Day, changes to the rules that now challenge Texas and its allies were confirmed in state courts before Election Day. Michigan’s 53 – page response included a one – point denial of alleged abuses in Texas, claiming that more votes were cast in Detroit than in the electorate. If the Supreme Court upholds Wisconsin, Texas legal theory, “New York or California can sue Texas or Alabama in this court. Garden type election disputes will soon come to court. Texas proposes extraordinary intrusion into the elections of Wisconsin and other defendants. ”

Source