Post-election piles in the Supreme Court continued Thursday as Pennsylvania-based Republican lawmakers called on the Supreme Court to overturn their own state’s electoral practices, seemingly reversing President Donald Trump’s previous obligations to avoid defeat by 81,000 votes. Keystone State is untouchable. Two days after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin to expel their election results, top GOP officials in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives appear to be taking the side of Lone Star State. . Brian Cutler, brief speaker of the court, and Kerry Benninghoff, majority leader, echoed Paxton’s argument, with their decisions and orders governing the rules governing absentee ballots and voting. “The executive branch shrunk from its obligations to uphold Commonwealth laws and then issued illegal guidelines to Commonwealth District Electoral Boards,” friend court brief readings. “Finally, these efforts were pardoned and further enhanced by a clear violation of the requirements of the U.S. Constitution by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.” In one separate filing, two dozen Republican Pennsylvania state senators, including Majority Leader Jack Gorman, argued that they were identical even if they had officially declared their support for their state or Texas. “This court must ensure that it gives jurisdiction to state legislatures under the electoral section of the U.S. Constitution and denies state Supreme Courts and executive branch officials, their attorney wrote. Korman previously rejected President Donald Trump’s demand that the legislature act to change his loss. Now, he joins Trump, the cult of GOP attorney general, activists and members of Congress. At the request of Texas. Meanwhile, Pennsylvania and Michigan – several blue states and Never Trump have joined Republican prosecutors – have urged the Supreme Court not to take up the case, saying Texas has no position to bring the case and that controversy over election law “can only come within the jurisdiction of the state courts.” The Constitution and Congress have helped to legislate for each state and resolve all disputes related to the presidential election in that state in its courts, “wrote former Acting Attorney General Stuart Gerson, a former Missouri sen. All senior Republican officials. “This Court Should Reject Plaintiff’s Request to Transfer the Powers of 50 State Court Systems to This Court.” President Donald Trump has sown, but he argues that judges should eventually find out against Texas: “People need an answer. They need to get one.” Doubts remain as to whether the president was elected in a constitutionally mandated manner, ”Yost wrote. “The relief that Texas seeks will undermine the very foundations of our federal system: the states are sovereign, free to govern themselves.” .
Source
