Ron Johnson to bring Ken Starr to testify at controversial hearing in 2020 elections



The trial has sparked strong criticism from senators on both sides, with concerns that Johnson is embroiled in failed conspiracy theories and that he is pushing for its removal despite calls from Democrats. But Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin, says he’s running for re-election in 2022 if he has not yet said so, and that his investigation is focused on “trying to restore confidence in the organization” and “trying to remove” questions about “suspicious activity” that occurred during the election. He says the inquiries will help determine whether House can join Republicans in challenging the January election results, and he met with Ohio Representative Jim Jordan, one of those conservatives, to prepare for trial next week. “If there is an irregularity that can be explained, well, set it aside because we need to restore confidence in our electoral system,” Johnson told CNN on Friday. “We have to change the laws or enforce the laws, so this will not happen in the future.” Democrats say the investigation is designed to present the unproven conspiracies put forward by President Donald Trump since Biden’s defeat in the election, the official said when its winning election college votes Monday. Biden won 306 of Trump’s 232 votes. Johnson’s trial is set to begin two days later. And Utah Sen, a Republican in his group. Mitt Romney told CNN that he would not take part in the “investigation.” “We have a process to be followed in this country, under the constitution and our judicial system,” Romney, the party’s 2012 candidate, said when asked about the trial on Friday. “Trying to change that process or interrupt it is a big mistake.” Johnson insists that it is not his goal, and that he and his staff are “reaching out to everyone who is researching this” to “accumulate all the abuses that have been publicized or not advertised.” “Then my next step, I’m going to try to stop it,” Johnson said. “I’m going to say, ‘Okay, so how do you explain this?’ Oh, there’s a reasonable explanation. “Johnson said Starr, a former independent adviser who interrogated Bill Clinton when he was president, will be a” leading witness “and will testify about the” warnings they gave us based on absentee votes. ” He said he had invited retired Judge Jim Tropez, a GOP lawyer representing the Trump campaign in Wisconsin, to testify with a lawyer in Nevada. He said they were also taking note of calling witnesses from Pennsylvania and Georgia, but on the contrary Biden won despite Trump’s unsubstantiated claims. “This is a clear violation of Wisconsin election law, what happened there,” Johnson said. “Now, what would be the solution?” But Republicans have failed to successfully challenge Wisconsin’s decisions in court, or there have been widespread abuses across the country to convince federal judges that they may change the outcome – not even presenting evidence of repeated court fraud. CNN’s Direct Election Results This week, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer questioned Johnson, calling for an immediate scrap of action, which he called an “absurd fight.” “This is completely irresponsible. Republican senators and Republican leaders are trying to defend the validity of our election by refusing to call Joe Biden president-elect,” Schumer said. “But go one step further and use our own Senate committee as a platform to spread misinformation.” Johnson met with Jordan this week, arguing that it was not his intention to “raise suspicions that a serious Trump ally is in office. We were talking about what we want to highlight, “said Johnson, referring to his meeting with Jordan at a joint sitting of Congress on January 6 to count the number of votes cast for the House Conservatives. The domain states plan to oppose the election results. While they are unlikely to win the election, they need the support of at least one senator to prolong the debate. Johnson did not rule out being that senator. Asked if he could join the House Republicans, Johnson said it depends on what he testifies at next week’s hearing. “If there is no good and satisfactory explanation for this, it is a problem.” Since he has aligned himself with Trump, Democrats are eager to challenge him if he contests a third term in 2022. “The election is not over,” Johnson said, referring to the November election that Biden won when asked if he would run again. When asked when he would make a decision, Johnson said: “After the election.” Ali Main and Sarah Fordinsky contributed to this report. .

Source

Leave a Comment