The U.S. Supreme Court’s decisive rejection of the election results of one state, Texas, in four other states could prevent such an attempt from happening again in future presidential elections. But the Texas case is not the only unprecedented attack. 2020 could mark the moment when Republicans used the same zeal they used to attack. Democracy in the run-up to elections, through voter repression and germination, is the ultimate attack on democracy, trying to deny and overturn the results. Here is a list of the five post-election attacks on democracy by Donald Trump and Republicans New 2020 but elections are likely to continue in the coming years. Particularly irresponsible and protracted election fraud allegations False allegations of electoral fraud are part of the US election, and Trump has specialized in this organization, committing more daring and systematic election fraud than ever before, and inciting elected officials to go with more lies than was possible before the Trump era. Republicans call Trump’s false accusations “legal challenges.” But by refusing to acknowledge the outcome of the election, Republicans weighed in on the notion that something extraordinary was going on other than Trump’s attempt to undermine popular will, and they opened a month-long window into the spread of Trump’s lies, at which time hope democracy in the United States was damaged. Political pressure on local election officials Will the certification of election results in key districts ever be taken back? Will the discriminatory poison that came to the local level in 2020 ruin the conduct of future elections at that level? They received death threats as local officials from both parties worked to complete the vote count and then certify. As a result. Many Republican officials, like Philadelphia, Michigan and Georgia, responded to the pressure. But other local Republican officials, as in Detroit, responded to Trump’s most glamorous attack as they sought to withdraw the certificate for the county results. In healthy times for American democracy, no one paid much attention to the certification process because it was taken as an article of unexplored belief that voting is a vote and that stamping is the sole role of the authorities. Now there is a clear opportunity for officials to be led by someone other than the White House, the Republican National Committee or the electorate. External legal challenges to certification of state election results have previously grown around elections, but never before in American history has there been a legal battle surrounding the Trump campaign following the election. The defeated Trump, in every state, has sued with multiple lawsuits, where flipting the decision will help him win. The fact that Trump has basically lost all cases does not discourage future presidential election campaigns from developing a post-election legal strategy. Plan: If you can’t win at the ballot box, try the courts. Domestic political challenges to the certification of state election results were linked by Trump, with lawmakers in Pennsylvania asking the Supreme Court to withhold certification of its results. Republican Senate candidates in Georgia have demanded that the Secretary of State of the Republican Republic resign. Republicans in Arizona have expressed outrageous behavior, saying the election should not be certified and challenging Twitter followers to express their willingness to die to prevent certification. Overall, the efforts of the elected officials of this state to respond to Trump’s sudden request to throw away what everyone previously recognized as a democratic process are half-hearted and futile. But if state-elected officials are serious about disrupting the certification process, they may be even more prepared for future elections. Should the role of the president be the presidency of the United States, and after an election, can the district election officials responsible for certifying the results be called? Should a president invite lawmakers to intervene in their state certification process for lunch? Should a president call a mob on Twitter against a local election official or a secretary of state who opposes his plans? No matter what damage American democracy suffers in 2020, most of it goes to the source, who forced a foreign leader to try to oust a president who did not do so, and turned the suffering of state governors into a condition for epidemic, who now twisted the hands of elected officials across the United States? Destroy the will of the American electorate. Trump’s role in attacking the unity of the American system is the most outrageous and unprecedented of all the dirty perversions of democracy that 2020 saw. In future White House and future elections, it will make all the difference whether that role will be reflected or republished.
Source