/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/dmn/PPIJAVZLHBCMNGUZ4BGGKW3VAE.jpg)
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump on Wednesday tweeted that he would join the long-running legal effort of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn election results in four states that helped give Democrat Joe Biden the presidency. Authorities in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin called the case an unsubstantiated stunt. Texas’ request is to ask the Supreme Court to deny the vote of 10.4 million people who chose Pita over Trump. Despite Trump’s legal team losing three dozen cases in federal and state court, the Supreme Court gave a clear hope in the Texas case, which was filed Monday, and ordered four defendants to respond in writing by Thursday before deciding whether to hear the case. “We will intervene in the case of Texas (and many more states). This is big. Our country needs a victory!” Trump tweeted, “The case that everyone is waiting for …. This is so strong, ALL CRITERIA MET. How do you think the president when the majority thinks the election is right?” Can he stay in office? ”Only the Supreme Court has jurisdiction over disputes between state governments, and in fact the court has shown little interest in second-guessing state election procedures. Created the greatest opportunity. ”Texas is asking judges to bar 62 voters from those four states from voting Monday when the Electoral College convenes to formalize Biden’s 306-232 victory – resulting in the court ordering 10.4 million Biden ballots to be set aside. Asks. Paxton co-chair attorneys are part of Trump’s presidential re-election committee. Democrat critics have speculated that his case is an attempt to sideline Trump in the hope of an early apology. The FBI is investigating allegations made by a former senior staff member that he used the office of the Attorney General of Paxton to benefit a campaign donor. Paxton has been indicted for more than five years on state criminal charges related to bond fraud, but the presidential pardon authority only covers federal offenses. Read the House Democracy Campaign Committee’s fundraising essay, “Instead of focusing on his own issues, he’s completely unsupported. Trump really won!” Trump claims election fraud or theft, but dozens of courts have dismissed such allegations as baseless, with U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr telling the judiciary last week that there was no evidence of widespread voter fraud, and that we will intervene in the Texas (and many more states) case. Our country needs a victory! – Donald J. Trump (realDonaldTrump) December 9, 2020 This is not my most misreported case, the one that everyone is waiting for is Texas and many others. Strong, ALL CRITERIA MET. How can you hold the presidency when the majority thinks the election is right? https://t.co/ZKu9sNVz2U— Donald J. Trump (realDonaldTrump) On Wednesday, December 9, 2020, Trump wrote to 27 House Republicans, including five from Texas, ordering Bar to name a special adviser to investigate election fraud. , Bar and complained that the judiciary did not take the allegations seriously. Terrell’s representative Lance Gooden led the Conservatives’ latest move to aim to trigger a federal criminal investigation. In Georgia, Chris Carr, President of the Attorney General’s Association of Paxton, represents Paxton – in which Paxton’s allegations are “constitutionally, legally and truly wrong.” “The Republican Secretary of State’s Office has certified Biden’s victory after three reconsiderations and called the allegations about Texas’ illegal practices” false and irresponsible. ” Texas’ appeal eight times refers to “plaintiff states.” But only Texas is suing at the moment, which says Paxton’s office tried and failed to get other states to join the effort. The state’s appeals attorney, who works for Paxton, did not sign the summary, and an extraordinary acquittal to a petition in the Supreme Court raised the possibility that he wanted to exclude himself from a dubious claim. The four states (plus) mentioned in the Texas case have massive evidence of widespread fraud. Check out all of the tapes and affidavits! – Donald J. Trump (realDonaldTrump) December 9, 2020 Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall suggested Tuesday that if the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case, his government may be willing to join Texas in a “fight to ensure electoral unity.” Five judges agree to hear such conflicts. Legal experts felt that this was not possible for a number of reasons, including reluctance to allow states to interfere in each other’s affairs. “If Texas can sue these states over how they conduct elections, what is there to prevent Vermont from suing Texas? Career, or other permutations? Steve Vladek, a law professor at the University of Texas and a frequent critic of Trump, called Paxton’s case “crazy” and “dangerous, offensive and futile … stunts.” On Tuesday, the Supreme Court briefly raised a challenge in Pennsylvania against Congressmen and Trump’s other Republicans who said the government had violated its own election laws by counting postal votes after election night. None of the nine judges, including the three appointed by Trump, raised the issue. The court did not provide any explanation for rejecting the claim, which reflects the consensus that it is not eligible in a case. Sen. Ted Cruz, who served as Texas Solicitor General prior to the 2012 election, agreed to defend the plaintiffs’ case if they appear in court. The lawsuit filed by Paxton’s court alleges that the four states he targeted did not vote illegally or by court order. All such votes are invalid, rather than the function of their legislatures. “Their failure to abide by the rules of the law casts a dark shadow of doubt over the outcome of the entire election,” Paxton, who co-chaired Trump’s lawyers, said in a statement. The states are asking the Supreme Court to delay the December 14 deadline for certification of voters and to advise that the Republican-controlled legislatures of the states select the electorate. This means denying the election of a democratic majority and effectively boycotting 10.4 million votes. At the White House for the summit on the release of the COVID-19 vaccine, the government’s Greg Abbott backed the case on Tuesday, saying it was “a way to speed up the process” and provided certainty and clarity about the entire electoral process. America needs it. Only a handful of Trump allies in Congress have acknowledged that the election was rigged. But a few dozen GOP lawmakers have acknowledged that Biden won, including only three from Texas. Legal experts see little merit in Texas’ attempt to challenge the electoral practices used in other states. Rick Hassan, a top election legal expert and professor at the University of California-Irvine, erred in his election law blog that Paxton’s case was “completely rubbish.” Dangerous rubbish, but rubbish. ”
Source