The Supreme Court of Wisconsin rejected it on Monday President TrumpChallenging the state’s review, it found Joe Biden elected President Wisconsin won by a margin of more than 20,600 votes.
It was Recent legal loss Mr. Trump is trying to overturn election results in a state of major wars. The court’s ruling came an hour before Wisconsin Voters were scheduled Mr. To give the state 10 election college votes to Pitton.
Mr. Trump’s lawyers tried to get more than 220,000 votes in the Dane and Milwaukee districts to claim that they had been voted illegally. The ballot includes the following: When the person who said the Trump campaign did not have proper written applications voted in person; Votes cast by persons who claim that they have been improperly sealed indefinitely, i.e. voters are not required to provide photo identification; Missing Votes Clerks who filled in the missing witness address information, which has been in effect since 2016; Ballots returned to parks in Madison.
At the end of 4-3, the majority, to the voters who have been imprisoned indefinitely, Mr. He said Trump’s challenge was “unqualified” and that he had waited too long to challenge other issues.
“Our laws allow us to fly the flag of challenge in relation to various aspects of the electoral administration,” Judge Brian Haggorn wrote to the majority. “The challenges posed by the campaign in this case have come after the last play or the last game; the campaign challenges the rule book adopted before the start of the season. These types of election demands must be brought quickly.
Conservative Judge Hogdorn joined the majority of the court’s three liberal judges. When Judge Jill Karofsky won his election in April, the Liberals reduced the Conservative majority in court to 5-2 to 4-3. In a similar opinion, Justices Karofsky and Rebecca Dald said there was no evidence of fraud.
“The Wisconsin electorate complied with the Electoral Rule Book. No penalties were imposed and the final score was the result of a free and fair election,” Justices Dalt and Karofsky wrote.
Chief Justice Patience Rojensak wrote one of the disagreements. He did not take issue with the initial non-appearance of the ballot and said there was insufficient information about voters who claim to have been locked up indefinitely to see if they have violated the law. He accused the majority of not answering critical questions about the conduct of the election Instead he said the majority relied on the long-awaited campaign to challenge the case.
“On November 3, 2020, a significant section of the public did not believe that the presidential election was fair,” Rojensak wrote. “Again, the four judges in this court cannot worry about the need for laws to ensure that absent ballots are legally cast.”
Shortly after the verdict, 10 Wisconsin voters voted for Mr Biden and Harris. “We did it,” Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers said after announcing the results.
Before the congressional vote count on Jan. 6, Mr. In the event that the court granted the state to Trump, Mr. Wisconsin Republicans also met Monday to count the number of voters for Trump. Wisconsin GOP President Andrew Hitt said Republicans “voted to defend our role in the election process, and the final results are still pending in the courts.”
This is the second time the Supreme Court of Wisconsin has ruled Review Challenge. Mr. Trump’s lawyers earlier this month called for original action on the appeal, but in a 4-3 ruling, Mr. The court ruled that Trump should take the case to the lower court first. On Friday, Reserve Judge Stephen Simanek confirmed the results of the review.
“There is no credible evidence of any malpractice or widespread fraud. The issue here is whether it was reconsidered in accordance with Wisconsin election laws,” Judge Simeonek said. “The court’s decision is that the petitioner and the appellants here have not proved that the misinterpretation of Wisconsin’s early voting laws took place here.”
Mr. Trump and his allies lost a series of lawsuits in Wisconsin in December. On Saturday, when the Wisconsin Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case, Mr. A federal judge appointed by Trump has rejected a separate attempt by the president to overturn Wisconsin’s election results.
“This court allowed the plaintiff the opportunity to present his case, and he disqualified,” Judge Brett Ludwig wrote. “In the summary of his answer, the plaintiff ‘asks that the rules of law be followed.’ That was it. “
Mr. Trump’s lawyers appealed the decision.
In another federal case, Judge Pamela Pepper rejected an election challenge brought by the La Cross County Republican leader last week. Mr. Sidney Powell, one of Trump’s legal allies, represented him. That case has been appealed.
Mr. Wisconsin’s Supreme Court earlier this month refused to take original action on two separate election challenges brought by Trump’s allies.