On Friday, the Wisconsin Legislature’s Committee on Campaigns and Elections will hold an inquiry into the 2020 presidential election, where Republican leader Ron Dassler hopes to get a clearer picture of the outcome. The Republican Party, which interviewed Dassler in a statement Wednesday in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Wednesday, indicated that it did not know which candidate actually carried the state and its 10 electoral votes, and said it could help the state’s GOP-controlled legislative effort to overthrow the state for President Trump. Election College Dec. It can tell us whether or not it has spent 21,000 votes on Donald Trump, and if that happens, I think we should seriously consider it. But if it’s just imaginary, I don’t think that’s enough, “he told the paper. When asked if he agrees with election officials who claim Joe Biden has won, he replied, “Ask me after the hearing. I think we’ve get some new information on that investigation.” He questioned how he was able to capture the state by a margin of 21,000 votes. Dassler did not immediately respond to a Fox News email. “It simply came to our notice then. After our election process was completed on November 3, there were many … who did not believe in the outcome of this election, “Dassler said at the time.” People in Wisconsin need to have confidence in our election. Critics of the president say he has not proven his case and points to legal setbacks his team has experienced. He wanted the judge to deliver to the party-controlled legislature, and Trump-appointed District Judge Brett Ludwig said: According to, there is a very difficult time which is fair in the federal court. The request to remand this case in the Legislature strikes me as bizarre. Bill Bock, Trump’s campaign lawyer in the federal case, said the court needed to rule that the election was “invalid” so the legislature could get involved. He also said that the term “remand” commonly used to describe when a case is referred to a lower court is “inactive”. The states have filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court in support of the Texas lawsuit aimed at delaying the appointment of presidential voters from Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. The summary reflects the argument of the Texas case that states acted unconstitutionally when their judiciary or executive branches changed their electoral laws. The Texas case and the states that support it claim that only state legislatures can legislate on how states elect their presidential voters. Democrats in Tulsar’s group said they expect little change after Friday’s hearing. Tyler Olson of Fox News and the Associated Press contributed to the report
Source