The sibilant immediately denounced the Arbitrators Commission’s arguments as untrue and claimed his dismissal was due to racism.
the referee Adalid Maganda attended the National Commission to Prevent Discrimination (Conapred), to reopen the case against Arturo Brizio, Chairman of the Arbitration Commission, who had already been accused by the whistleblower of racism since 2018. Now, the central is seeking “worthy” compensation and in accordance with the law.
At the meeting, which lasted about half an hour, the lord of the whistle asked Conapred to reopen the case, Which resulted from the complaint he made in 2018, and in which he accused Arturo Brizio of racism. On this occasion, Adalid Maganda called for reinstatement in her workplace, but now calls for a “dignified exit,” those present at the meeting reported.
The referee came in the company of one of his lawyers and Conapred had been the target of the case for a few days. They will analyze the complaint and then announce the measures to be taken.
Adalid Maganda was fired from the Referees Commission three weeks ago and as it was argued that his departure was due to the fact that he failed two physical tests, in addition to having some errors in the match of day one, between Toluca and Galls.
The sibilant immediately denounced the arguments of the Referees Commission as untrue and claimed that his dismissal was due to racism, pointing to Arturo Brizio as the main culprit.
Maganda and her lawyers met twice with the lawyers of the Mexican Football Federation, to try to reach a friendly agreement, but no agreement could be reached, so the gentleman of the whistle came to Conapred, to reopen the case, although on this occasion he requests that he be given a “decent” financial remuneration to leave the arbitration and not the reinstatement in his place.