Controversy in the Madrid derby for an alleged hand in the area

by

The referee decided Felip did not seek the ball with his hand and decided not to score

After 42 minutes, a couple of quick and successful challenges followed by a shot from just outside the penalty area by Felip might have resulted in another goal for Tony Kroos. The players of the Real Madrid claimed a penalty and the referee decided to contact him with the hand of the player of the Athletic of Madrid nhe deserved it criminally.

Felipe cleared the ball with his hand, unintentionally, and immediately the VAR called Hernández Hernández, the whistler, decided it was not criminal, Which immediately sparked controversy on social media.

Hernández Hernández, According to the collaborator of ESPN Mister Chip, In his career he has attended the VAR 11 times and Felipe’s hand was the first time he contradicted the Video Arbitration, which suggested he had a penalty in favor of the meringues.

“Hernández Hernández has reviewed the monitor at the request of the VAR on 11 occasions (10 in League and 1 in Cup) since video arbitration was used in Spain. Today’s is the FIRST TIME in which he maintains the its initial decision and contradicts the VAR, ”the data analyst posted.

The decision helped Atletico Madrid to go 1-0 up in the half, as the play took place three minutes before the end of the first half. In addition, Zidane’s set was able to score.

The controversy on social media exploded, Because for days it has been unclear the criteria for marking a hand within the area.

The claims of the Real Madrid players accompanied the gentleman of the whistle until the break, because at halftime several meringue players came to claim his decision, which avoided a penalty in favor of the visiting team.

.Source