Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
The Plenum of Magistrates of the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ) unanimously accepted the formal excuse presented by Rolando Argueta for not participating in the discussion of the appeal filed in favor of Kevin Solórzano.
“He presented his excuse for being included in the causes, as in previous years he issued a previous opinion on this case and on all the actions of the investigation process while acting as director of prosecutors of the Ministry Public, “he explained Melvin Duarte, Spokesperson for judiciary in the capital.
Kevin Joshua Solórzano Hernández he was acquitted of criminal liability in October 2020 by the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, for the crimes of murder and attempted murder for which he was charged in November 2014.
related: Kevin Solórzano’s family has hopes that Cort will ratify his acquittal
At this time, the Court of Cassation, as a result of analysis, noted “the existence of judicial arguments contrary to the principles and rules that make up sound criticism as a model of correct human reasoning,” then arguing that the court arguments “were flawed.”
In February 2017, a three-judge court found guilty of murder and attempted murder to the university; but there was a dissenting vote by one of the magistrates who make up the court.
Besides: Why did the tests fail in favor of Kevin Solórzano?
Five arguments presented by the Public Ministry were key to the sentence against Kevin Solórzano, among them, the testimony of the widow and one of her children, the spoken portrait and the telephone emptying.
Subsequently, the defendant was sentenced by the first chamber of the Sentencing Court to 20 years imprisonment for the murder of former prosecutor Edwin Geovanny Eguigure Abdul, and 13 years with four months for attempted trial against his wife Maria Auxiliadora Serra.