Democrats see Georgia as a lifeline in the war on voting rights

Republican state lawmakers participated in a nationwide effort to rewrite the ballot access laws after the safest and most participatory election in history, they achieved their first major achievement on Thursday when the Georgian government Brian KempBrian Kemp: Democrats See Georgia as Opening War Against Voting Rights Tornado leaves at least 1 dead in Newnan, Georgia Bill Clinton on Georgia’s new voting restrictions: “An attack on our democracy” MORE (R) signed a comprehensive law reform package that will restrict voters ’access to ballot boxes for absenteeism and ballot boxes.

In other states, Democrats watched with growing anxiety, knowing their legislatures were as follows.

“We’ve been watching Georgia very closely and we knew our Republican lawmakers would probably introduce something as well,” said Michigan State Sen. Stephanie Chang (D), who represents part of Detroit and its southern suburbs.

The day before Kemp signed the Georgia legislative package, Michigan Republicans introduced 39 bills to change a voting process that resulted President BidenJoe Biden: Democrats see Georgia as an open salvation in the MLB voting war could move Georgia’s All-Star game after controversial new electoral restrictions. Biden fired most members of the DHS MORE advisory board bring the state by 154,000 votes by 2020. Among the measures are proposals to limit the ability of election officials to send absentee ballot applications, require a copy of a voter’s ID when a absentee voting and a limit for scroll boxes.

These measures are in addition to the more than 250 bills introduced in legislatures across the country this year that will impose new requirements or restrictions on the means of voting, according to the recommendations of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.

Conservative groups that support the reforms, such as the Heritage Foundation, which supports legislation such as the revision of Georgia in seven other states, say the reforms are not intended to vote for voters of a specific race.

“This is just an old trope of the left to say that things are racist that they do not like. Our view is that it should be easy to vote and cheat, “said Garrett Bess, vice president of government relations for Heritage Action.” There was a need for some standardization that was not forced federally, but state by state, to ensure that best practices be followed in conducting elections “.

The bills are apparently meant to address the shaken faith in an electoral reform process that those appointed by the Trump administration called the safest and safest in the country’s history.

“Republicans have set fire essentially by alleging widespread electoral fraud and convincing their base that this is true, and then acting like the firefighter who comes to extinguish election fraud that doesn’t exist by passing all these unnecessary voter plans on suppression law, “said state Rep. Chris Turner (D), president of the Texas House Democratic Caucus.

In interviews, Democratic lawmakers drew a direct parallel between the former President TrumpDonald Trump: Democrats see Georgia as an opening war against MLB voting rights could move Georgia’s all-star party after controversial new electoral restrictions.the false claims of electoral wrongdoing, the January 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, and the laws that are advancing today in Republican-controlled legislatures.

“After their failed coup attempt, Republicans across the country, especially in Georgia and Arizona, are following Plan B,” Arizona State Representative Athena Salman, the whip of the state, said. democratic minority. “I have not heard any discussion [from Republicans] this is not related to the big lie “.

Amid a committee that heard a proposal this week to require voters to submit a copy of a state-issued ID along with an absentee ballot, the Republican chairman of the House and Elections Committee of the House of Representatives the state cut Salman off and tried to vote for her.

In states like Georgia, Arizona and Texas, where Republicans have control of both houses of the state legislature and the government, there is little the Democrats can do to delay or vote on new voting restrictions.

The minority may delay some bills: in Arizona in February, a single Republican state senator voted with Democrats to block an attempt to remove a permanent mailing list. This week in Texas, a committee hearing on a key bill was delayed when a procedural snafu caused a hiccup.

“This is a very bright line for the members of our group. We are unified in opposition to laws that would make voting difficult. We’re going to fight it with everything we have, ”Turner said. Still, he acknowledged,“ It’s uphill. ”

Even in a state like Michigan, where the Democratic governor. Gretchen WhitmerGretchen Whitmer: Democrats see Georgia as a life-saving opening in the war on voting rights Michigan GOP leader mentions “assassination” in response to a question about anti-Trump Republicans that Michigan will likely not tighten restrictions on as the virus increases in the MORE state almost certainly vetoing partisan election restriction laws, Republicans have a chance to work around the governor.

In comments to a local Republican club this week, Michigan Republican Party President Ron Weiser said the party could use a provision of state law that allows the Republican Party to collect 340,000 signatures, about 15 percent of the number total of Michiganders who voted for Whitmer. submit an electoral review package to the legislature. Whitmer would be unable to veto this legislation.

Many of the key provisions of the new legislation would unquestionably constitute new barriers for minorities and low-income voters, who are more likely to live in areas with fewer polling stations and longer lines. A myriad of studies in the recent election have shown that those living in very minority areas wait longer in line to vote than those living in very white areas.

A provision in Georgia’s recently passed law would make it a crime to distribute bottled water to voters waiting in line.

Legislation to revise long-standing voting rules is not limited to swing states. The Montana Republican-controlled legislature is one step closer to approving the end of voter registration the same day, following an election in which the party regained the governor’s mansion and retained control of the legislature. The Missouri State House has passed a new voter identification bill after the state Supreme Court issued an earlier version. The West Virginia State Senate passed a measure that ended voter registration on the same day and cut an early voting period.

Democracy-controlled legislators are in the midst of their own electoral reviews. Many, but not all, of these measures would make permanent some of the temporary extensions of voting rights implemented in the midst of the pandemic.

This week, New Jersey lawmakers passed a bill to allow voters to vote early, a practice that has been delayed in northeastern states. The Illinois legislature sent Gov. JB Pritzker (D) a bill to extend postal voting and remote voting. Washington lawmakers passed a bill to restore the right to vote for criminals once they get out of jail.

The stark difference in the two approaches to voting rights illustrates the new incentive structure created for Republicans by a former president who began laying the groundwork to deflect blame for his loss even before voters actually they would start voting. Democrats used to compete for the same rules as Republicans now say they face an opposition that wants to change the rules instead of playing.

“Actually, you can spread your message to a larger electorate or you can try to change the rules. They will go the way of the losers,” said Michigan State Sen. Jim Ananich, the leader of the Democratic minority. “It simply came to our notice then. But in the short term they will have some success in the legislatures, but we will take them to the courts ”.

.Source