“Unprecedented”: Wall Street reflects on Goldman’s Block-Trade Spree

Goldman remains rivals in setting net emission targets

Photographer: Michael Nagle / Bloomberg

As Wall Street speculated about the identity of the mysterious seller behind the massive $ 10.5 billion in blockchain operations executed Friday by Goldman Sachs Group Inc., investors also questioned the extent to which the sale was unprecedented. and if there will be more to come.

Sales lit up the chat rooms of New York merchants in Hong Kong and were part of an extraordinary party that erased $ 35 billion from the values ​​of bellwether stocks, ranging from technology giants. Chinese to US media conglomerates.

“I’ve never seen anything of this magnitude in my 25-year career,” said Michel Keusch, portfolio manager at Bellevue Asset Management AG in Switzerland.

Goldman sold shares in Baidu Inc., Tencent Music Entertainment Group and Vipshop Holdings Ltd. worth $ 6.6 billion before opening the market in the US, according to an email to customers seen by Bloomberg News. This move was followed by the sale of $ 3.9 billion worth of shares of ViacomCBS Inc., Discovery Inc., Farfetch Ltd., iQiyi Inc. and GSX Techedu Inc., according to the email.

Block trades (selling a large number of shares at a price that is sometimes traded off the market) are common, but the size of these trades and the multiple blocks that go on the market during normal trading hours negotiation are not.

“That was very unusual,” said Oliver Pursche, senior vice president of Wealthspire Advisors, which manages $ 12 billion in assets. “The question now is: are they over? Is this over? Or come Monday and Tuesday, will markets be affected by another wave of blockchain operations? ”

Read more: Goldman sold $ 10.5 billion worth of shares in blocks

The transactions led to price changes for all the shares involved in high-volume transactions, caused doubts to traders and caused talk of a hedge fund or a family office being in trouble and being forced to sell. .

The situation is worrying “because we don’t have all the answers on whether it was the liquidation of a single fund or more than one fund, or whether it was a liquidation of funds to begin with and the reason behind it. said Pursche.

“It can be difficult for a manager from the point of view of positioning. Another wave of blockchain operations may force fund managers to reassess their commitment to some actions, ”he said.

“Unprecedented”

Frederik Hildner, portfolio manager at Salm-Salm & Partner GmbH in Wallhausen, Germany, described the move as “unprecedented”. He added: “The question is why did these blogging businesses take place? Does a company know something that others don’t know or were somehow forced to reduce risk?

.Source