The main headlines in the media on 13 September
In the media news, an MSNBC historian uses 9/11 to campaign against Republicans, an LA Times columnist calls Larry Elder a “real threat” to communities of color, and Glenn Kessler of the The Washington Post scoffs at praising the New York vaccine mandate
With the Texas Heartbeat Act causing a stir in the press over the past two weeks, the liberal media’s partisan passion for abortion was more evident than ever.
“In my experience across multiple TV and radio channels, the liberal bias of the press is nowhere more pronounced than in abortion coverage,” conservative radio presenter Erick Erickson posted on Twitter.
Texas law, which bans abortions after six weeks and allows people to sue abortion clinics and those who help women get abortions, went ahead after the Supreme Court ruled in a ruling. from 5 to 4 that the law could remain in force.
Anchors, correspondents, and guest experts did not hide their frustration with the audience, targeting segments with an emotional charge about the new law.
“Why this is so big, not just for Texas women, is because it sends a chill down the spine to all the women in this country who are worried about their condition, fearing they might use it as a plan. for what could be a way to avoid Roe v. Wade in ways that haven’t worked in years past, reacted CNN co-anchor Early Start Laura Jarrett, daughter of former Obama adviser, Valerie Jarrett.
THE MEDIA FEARS THE WORST AFTER THE TEXAS ABORTION BAN: “WHO IS GONNA INVADES TEXAS TO RELEASE WOMEN AND GIRLS”
CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin, who predicted in 2018 that abortion would be illegal in 20 states by the end of 2019 with the removal of Judge Anthony Kennedy, called the Supreme Court’s actions an “absolute disgrace.” In a Chicken Little reference, he said “the sky is falling now.”
It was the same story on MSNBC, where legal analyst Joyce Vance said the provision of the new law was a lawsuit similar to slave rewards. Former Republican and MSNBC presenter Nicolle Wallace boasted of having voted only for Democrats since 2016 and wondered if Robert Mueller would investigate the “collusion” between the Supreme Parliament and the GOP legislatures on the abortion.
A Liberal journalist quit her job in July and noted she could be more open to being pro-election. CBS journalist Kate Smith, who had covered CBS’s “access to abortion” since 2018, made waves when she announced on Twitter that she would leave the network.
“Now that I’m not a journalist, I can be honest about my own views on reproductive rights,” Smith wrote. “I’ll say this: with or without Roe v Wade access to abortion is disappearing south and midwest for low-income women. And it’s happening more or less under the radar.”
So what about the abortion that has led a CBS journalist to quit her job, a CNN analyst to say “the sky is falling,” and a Washington Post columnist suggesting that Texas women should be “released”? Pro-life activists and liberal leaders and analysts on the other side of the debate tried to answer the question.
“The dramatic, angry, partisan coverage of Texas’ new heartbeat law is very revealing, and sadly, not at all surprising, ”Concyed Women for America President Penny Nance told Fox News Digital. “This law was properly debated and passed with bipartisan support by democratically elected lawmakers in the state of Texas. Texans want this law.”
“Leftists and the media are angry at the Supreme Court’s refusal to intervene and act as judicial activists,” he continued. “We are very grateful to have a Supreme Court that understands its role and refuses to be manipulated by a loaded emotional public pressure.”
SAM BEE CONSERVATIVE LABEL SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE “MONSTER WITHOUT GUTLING” ON TEXT ABORTION LAW
Federalist Mollie Hemingway argued that the media is more “out of touch” about abortion than any other issue.
“Honestly, there’s no problem with the media being more out of touch than the abortion issue, and the media is out of touch with the American public on almost everything these days.” Hemingway told Fox News Digital. “The truth is that a large majority of the country favors many restrictions on abortion, otherwise it will directly ban the state-backed eugenics and infanticide regime created by Roe.”
“Consequently, the media does not even ask basic questions that would easily expose the many fraudulent justifications used by abortion advocates,” he added.
Hemingway argued that the apparent pro-abortion bias in the media is also important in the unanswered questions about President Joe Biden. He said the media, which has often referred to Biden as a devout Catholic, should have rushed into the president’s recent admission that he doesn’t believe life begins at conception, an inversion of his previous position.
PRO-LIFERS PUSH AS A HIGH-LEFT PUBLIC QUESTION SCIENCE ON CHEAP FETAL CHOIRS AFTER TEXAS ABORTION REGULATIONS
“Not only was it an reversal of Biden’s previous statements on the matter, but it should raise a very obvious question in our pro-abortion media: if the president doesn’t believe life begins at conception, when does he believe exactly it begins? life?” Hemingway said. “Does our president really deny the most basic facts about biological reality? Answering these questions would be humiliating and condemning to abortion advocates, so you can be sure the corporate media won’t ask them.”
But Fox News contributor Jessica Tarlov, who offers a perspective from the other side of the debate, said the media’s emotional response to Texas law and abortion in general is justified and expected. .
Tarlov identified guns and abortion as “the two main animation problems” that will always “shoot both sides.” He said the Texas Heartbeat Act has especially awakened people because it is “poisonous,” “anti-science,” and “outdated even with the pro-life movement.” Like many critics of the bill, he noted that many women “don’t even know they’re pregnant” at six weeks.
“I think the time period, the six weeks, is really activating people and really proving that this was something first written by men,” Tarlov told Fox News Digital. “No woman thinks six weeks is enough time to make a decision of this magnitude. And there are no sizes for rape or incest.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPLICATION
“I am very passionate about the subject because I know many women who have had to make this incredibly difficult decision,” Tarlov said. “I don’t know anyone who has taken it lightly. This is a fallacy that Republicans (pro-life) have published in the ecosystem … and also because we are a nation of laws and respects the privacy of a person and their doctor. “
The Justice Department sued Texas for the law last week, but assured that the debate over abortion will continue to headline in the coming months.