Sometimes following science is not that easy, especially when “science” is in flux.
This is certainly the case with the Biden administration’s plan to launch COVID-19 booster shots at people already vaccinated. The White House pledged in August to begin deploying the new blows on a widespread basis from Sept. 20, but it is becoming increasingly clear that the whole process is more than a little messy; the administration’s reinforcement plan, and on Monday joined a larger group of 18 scientists who say there is not enough data to support a widespread reinforcement campaign.
The involvement? President Biden succeeded come in of science.
“While the idea of further reducing the number of COVID-19 cases by enhancing immunity in vaccinated individuals is appealing, any decision to do so should be evidence-based and take into account the benefits and risks for people and society, “the group wrote in The Lancet medical journal.
How New York according to the magazine, there are several moving parties in the debate today. On the one hand, there are concerns about decreased immunity among vaccinated people; on the other hand, these people still seem to have good protection against serious illness and death. Israel is already giving impetus, and early data suggest that, at the very least, for older people, the extra shots improve immunity. Then again Lancet the authors warn that the side effects of impellers administered too soon or too often could aggravate the widespread hesitation that has helped the pandemic persist in the United States. Complicating all this: the World Health Organization has warned against a widespread reinforcement campaign while much of the planet is still waiting for its first shot.
What can a president do, especially one who has repeatedly promised to “follow science”?
When Donald Trump ruled, Democrats were easy to commit to pursuing science about COVID because Trump didn’t make it clear, preferring to focus on his own political well-being. But, in a continuous emergency, when the scientists themselves cannot agree on a line of action and when there are ethical issues that do not lend themselves to clarifying “correct or incorrect” answers, the insufficiency of the slogan it is revealed. Even with the best of intentions, politics will continue to be a factor: Biden poll scores continue to slip and you need to see it done something.
“Follow Science” sounds easy and simple. In the real world, however, the dollar does not stop in a laboratory, but in the oval office.
you may also like it
Did Theranos lose Afghanistan?
Why isn’t Morpheus actor Laurence Fishburne in the Matrix Resurrections trailer? He says he was not “invited.”
Is rural America becoming a new confederation?