Jamie Lee Curtis says “no f ** k” with Scarlett Johansson while defending the actress in a lawsuit

Jamie Lee Curtis went on to beat Scarlett Johansson in the middle of his Black Widow lawsuit.

The 62-year-old actress wrote a heavily written opinion piece for Time magazine on Wednesday, in which she explained her views on the star’s decision to take legal action against Disney.

Curtis defended the 36-year-old actress for her ‘a brilliant response to a real manipulation of major film studios, warning readers “Don’t f ** k” with actress Black Widow.

Johansson sues Disney for breach of contact for its decision to release its Marvel film simultaneously in streaming and theaters, a move that Scarlet alleges cost him millions.

The Freaky Friday star was commissioned to write a play about Scarlett for the 100 Most Influential People of 2021 where she talked about feeling a “kinship” with the actress, before praising her performance as Black Widow, at which point he made a comparison between the plot of the film and Johansson’s real-life legal situation.

I recently saw her as the Black Widow, who avenged a powerful figure who manipulates women (with an emphasis on man) to fight for him.

And then I saw his brilliant response to a real-life manipulation (the same emphasis) when he filed a lawsuit for breach of contract against the studio, alleging that his decision to release the film simultaneously in cinemas and that cost him substantial pay losses.

“Whether it’s as a conscious killer, as an actor with an emotional center, or, having just given birth to her second child, a ferocious mother, the message is clear: don’t be fooled by this mama bear,” she concluded. .

On July 29, Scarlett filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging that Disney was in breach of its contract by releasing Black Widow to its Disney + streaming service.

The film premiered simultaneously in the service and in theaters, and stated in the lawsuit that since his salary had to be based on the film’s box office numbers, his contract would have to be d ‘have renegotiated to take into account the revenue from the transmission.

The simultaneous release that was added meant that the Marvel movie was performing at the box office and owed more than the $ 20 million promised in its initial contract.

The film grossed $ 80 million at its theatrical opening in North America and $ 60 million worldwide at Disney +. It earned $ 367 million worldwide at the box office and an additional $ 125 million in streaming.

Disney responded to the lawsuit by saying, “There is no merit in this filing” and that the simultaneous release had “significantly increased” its compensation.

“The lawsuit is especially sad and distressing for its disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Disney has fully fulfilled Ms. Johansson’s contract, and in addition, the launch of Black Widow at Disney + with Premier Access has significantly improved its ability to obtain additional compensation in addition to the $ 20 million it has received so far.” .

In August, Disney filed a motion to transfer the lawsuit to private arbitration, after the Johansson file also demanded a jury trial.

His lawyer, Daniel Petrocelli, argued that “Disney fulfilled its obligation to give the film a wide-ranging film release, but that nothing in the contract required that the release be exclusive to theaters,” according to Variety.

His lawyer John Berlinski responded that the company had responded to the initial lawsuit by delivering a “misogynistic attack” and that it was now “trying to hide its misconduct in confidential arbitration.”

Other celebrities who have supported the actress ’actions are Elizabeth Olsen of WandaVision, who told Vanity Fair in August,“ I think it’s so hard and literally when I read it was ”good for you Scarlett “.

Marvel universe actor Benedict Cumberbatch called it all “a little messy” in a conversation with The Hollywood Reporter on September 8.

It’s all a bit messy. Let’s try to understand what the revenue streams of artists contributing to Disney’s billion-dollar business should be. And it has to be hired ”.