WASHINGTON (AP) – The Trump administration resumed talks on Tuesday in the Capitol Hill chaotic Govt-19 talks, which presented a $ 916 billion package to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, which will send $ 600 in direct fees to most Americans. The offer was made by Treasury Secretary Steven Munuchin Pelosi on Tuesday afternoon, he said in a statement. He provided some details, however House GOP chairman Kevin McCarthy proposes $ 600 for individuals and $ 1,200 for couples, half the payment provided by the March Epidemic Relief Bill. Leaders including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who clashed with Democrats over the COVID-19 relief, approached Muchin Pelosi after a call with Congress’ top GOP. McConnell previously proposed a democratic priority – to help state and local governments – stop putting on a shield instead of abandoning his own pets. Against cases of negligence related to COVID. Democrats angrily rejected the idea, saying McConnell was undermining the efforts of the bipartisan committee of Senate negotiators and rejecting earlier reports that state and local aid should be part of a COVID-19 relief deal, giving Democrats control. Top Republicans say they do not want direct payments, which are expensive and send more aid to those in need. Democrats generally embrace this idea. “Right now we are targeting struggling families, failed businesses, health workers, not every person has a trigger test regardless of need,” said R-Maine’s Sen. Susan Collins said. , He is the chairman of a bipartisan group pushing for a $ 908 billion deal. The $ 916 billion bounty offer, separate rankings and ongoing negotiations between senators and the White House’s transformation demands are all confusing, confusing opportunities for a long-delayed COVID-19 aid package. The pressure to deliver is intense – all parties say failure is not an option. A group of moderates led by West Virginia Democrats Joe Munchin and Collins is seeking to mobilize lawmakers in both parties behind the $ 908 billion structure. This is more generous than a GOP plan already filed twice, but much smaller than the wishlist assembled by House Democrats. M. Connell said Congress would not adjourn without providing long-delayed COVID-19 relief. He had previously said he would not lay on the ground any bill that would not include the shield of liability demanded by businesses, universities, nonprofits and others that reopen during epidemics. “The set can’t walk away from here without a govt relief,” McConnell said. “Obviously why shouldn’t we set aside two issues that are highly controversial. We know we’re going to face another demand after the first date of the year. We’ll live to fight another day.” Upper Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer immediately rejected the request, claiming that state and local relief was being sought by several Republicans, including some conservatives such as Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Mitt Romney of Utah. Pelosi exploded McConnell’s offer in an attempt to reduce the bipartisan group he supports as the basis for negotiations. Pelosi initially demanded more than $ 900 billion from state and local governments this spring, but the financial situation in the states is worse than feared and Democratic leaders could be prepared to accept the moderate group’s $ 160 billion plan. Already, Capitol Hill leaders are moving the government’s strike deadline to next weekend, but progress has been slow and key decisions have yet to be made. The council voted Wednesday on a one-week provisional government finance bill. Without action, the government will close this weekend. Separately, Richard Shelby, R-Ala, chairman of the Pelosi and Senate Appropriations Committee, spoke by phone Monday in an attempt to begin negotiations on a separate $ 1.4 trillion government-sponsored bill. More than $ 12 billion could be squeezed into legislation, including protections for the Sage Group, census and accounting maneuvers. M. Connell initially proposed a five-year warranty. Companies and organizations from cases related to COVID-19. Democrats, along with their allies in labor and civil rights groups, rejected that approach as a danger to workers. There is no wave of cases. “Contrary to the majority leader’s harsh predictions, there has been no flood of Govt cases. In fact, the opposite is true,” Schumer told DNY. “Far from the epidemic of lawsuits, there’s a trick.”