If you live in California, you will likely be able to make many more Uber and Lyft trips in electric vehicles in the coming years. The state clean air agency is ready to demand that almost all vehicles used by drivers working for ridesharing companies be electric by 2030.
He proposal of the California Air Resources Board, announced late last month and to be decided next month, would slowly meet mileage standards for car-sharing companies forcing a certain number of miles traveled annually with electric vehicles. The requirements would begin to demand them 2% of all annual kilometers traveled by electric vehicle travel companies in 2023, rising to 30% in 2026, then to 50% in 2027 and reaching 90% in 2030. This is an increase over last year When CARB considered mandatory 60% of shared miles traveled be electric in 2030.
CARB found that in 2018, shared vehicles such as Uber and Lyft accounted for 1% of the state’s total emissions of road passenger cars that year. This may not sound like much, but cars are pretty important in California. Pgassenger vehicles make up a huge amount one-third of total state emissions, ahead of other greats emitting sectors such as livestock and power plants. The move to regulate car-sharing emissions is just one part of a larger push by the state to control vehicle emissions. In September, Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order get all vehicles sold in the state to be electric by 2035, which is estimated to reduce global emissions by 35%. Pretty big moves!
Although ridesharing companies have done so in the past promoted car sharing options provided by services like Uber Pool as an environmentally friendly option, a to study conducted last year by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that Uber and Lyft travel created nearly 70% more emissions than the attractions they moved. Tstudied calculated a solo trip in shared car has created on average 50% more emissions than if the person had just used their own car, mainly due to the shared vehicle driving to one place to another before and after the trip. Meanwhile, those pool attractions that car-sharing companies said were greener options that actually generated the same amount of emissions as a normal car trip. And with the pandemic temporarily halting pooling options, people are likely to do so use more Uber or Lyft will not opt for group travel in the near future, i.e. we are more likely to do those solo trips that have a lot of emissions.
G / O Media may receive a commission
Maybe intuit the next electric vehicle revolution, and maybe also an opportunity for good PR, given a few years press less than flattering—Uber and Lyft have made big electric cars own promises. Bother companies he said last year all attractions across the country by 2030 would be 100% electric. But Lyft has done the same claimed to be carbon neutral because he buys compensation, and they both have it fought against other regulations.
Another thing that regulators should take into account, especially considering companies history of tall corners i abusive drivers, is how these companies choose to launch their new electric vehicle fleets, especially as an incentive drivers, and whether they will do so fairly. The CARB report admits that the agency “[does] I do not know the exact strategies of TNCs [transportation network companies] will use, or how TNC business models may evolve in the future.”
But the agency he said he hoped lower targets in the early years would help companies help drivers, especially in lower-income areas, acquire electric vehicles. Meanwhile, Bloomberg Green reported last month that Uber was missing payments he had promised drivers as incentives to switch to electric vehicles. As we’ve seen before from shared travel companies, making promises is easy – keeping those promises is tricky.