“Well, if that changes, I’ll let you know,” Feinstein told CNN when asked if he was committed to spending the rest of his time. . The chamber was confronted with questions about her ability – a sharp focus during Amy Connie Barrett’s confirmation hearings before the election. During the trial, Feinstein examined Barrett’s comments, but also spoke fondly of President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court candidate – who later embraced Senate Justice Lindsay Graham, who praised the Republicans of South Carolina for his handling of the proceedings, while Democrats argued for a trial. Feinstein’s handling of the inquiries provoked a outcry from the left, leading to heated conversations between him and Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, who later said he would leave the top Democrats in the group. If she had been in her place, she would have been the first woman to serve as chair of the committee if the Democrats had recaptured the Senate next year. Instead, the Sen. of Illinois. Dick Durbin will take his place in the new Congress. This week, a New Yorker article raised further questions about Feinstein’s ability to do the job, citing anonymous Democrats whose sharpness and memory have deteriorated dramatically in recent years. When asked if the article was fair, Feinstein said: “No, not particularly, no one has spoken to me.” The article noted that his office declined to comment. Democrats raise personal concerns about Feinstein, which is a painful chapter for many who value his long service. .
Source