The Senate MP issued a ruling Monday night paving the way for unlimited use of a budget procedure to avoid legislative filibuster.
Elizabeth MacDonough’s ruling, which is largely unknown to the public, could change the way Washington operates and give Democrats ample leeway to move forward on their agenda over the next two years.
Here are five reasons why the decision changes the game.
Biden can do so much more without GOP support
The most immediate change resulting from the parliamentarian’s decision is that President Biden
Joe Biden’s startling presidency Hill’s Morning report: Biden and McConnell agree on vaccines, infrastructure clash Republican battle with MLB intensifies MORE he suddenly has more options to pass important parts of his agenda, even with a 50-50 split in the Senate and Vice President Harris ’tiebreaker vote.
“It’s important because it gives us a little more flexibility: we don’t have to push everything into one package,” said the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders: The Hill’s Morning Report: Biden’s Infrastructure Plan Triggers the Debate on Definitions. Sunday show: infrastructure in the spotlight Bernie Sanders chases Elon Musk for wanting to explore space MORE (I-Vt.), He told MSNBC Monday night.
Budget reconciliation is a process that can dodge a legislative hurdle, but it must be linked to an annual budget resolution.
At the beginning of his term, Biden saw three opportunities to use the budget solution. The first, with the 2021 resolution that Congress did not bother to pass before the start of the fiscal year in October, was used for the $ 1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief bill. The second would be tied to prosecutor 2022 and a third could be used next year, before prosecutor 2023, but before Democrats face midterm elections that could cause them to lose control of any chamber in Congress.
The new ruling means Biden could theoretically step back as many times as he wants to amend the budget resolution to pass more policies, regardless of the fiscal year and what happens to the budget.
If it is easier to split the infrastructure package into four separate bills, for example, or if you want to pass an additional reduction in COVID-19, raise corporate taxes, or change the age of eligibility for Medicare (all without Republican support), now has the parliamentary blessing to do so through reconciliation, or at least prove it.
In addition, it erodes the power of the filibuster
Progressives have lobbied for the Senate majority leader Charles Schumer
Chuck Schumer: From steel to fiber, libraries are American infrastructure When it comes to a nuclear deal with Iran, what can a moderate Democrat do? Proponents of gun control applaud Biden’s funding plan, but say more needs to be done (DN.Y.) to remove the filibuster, the 60-vote threshold needed to move forward in most legislation.
The ruling can take some of the wind out of its sails, because it will make it easier for the ruling party to advance legislation with a simple majority in the Senate.
Right now, that applies to Democrats, who control both houses of Congress and the White House. In the future, it will give similar opportunities to Republicans, who found themselves in the same position in 2017 and could have it again in the future.
But critics of the filibuster are unlikely to be satisfied given the stringent set of limitations on the types of legislation they can advance through reconciliation.
While the budget solution is ideal for changing taxes, benefits, some health care parameters, and even large-scale investments, it touches a wall on issues that are not directly related to deficits.
The boundaries of policies that are outside the boundaries of reconciliation, collectively known as the Byrd Rule, require that any policy be not “merely incidental” to its budgetary effects, a call the MP makes on a case-by-case basis.
In late February, he ruled that an increase in the minimum wage did not reduce it. Similar rulings can be handed down if Democrats try to move forward on labor rights legislation, such as the PRO Act, gun legislation, voting rights and immigration reform, all party priorities.
To approve any of them, they will have to set aside the filibuster or seek the support of 10 Republican senators.
It gives even more power to the Sen. Joe Manchin
Joe Manchin: The Hill’s Morning Report: Biden and McConnell agree on vaccines and crash into infrastructure. Manchin calls on CDC to discuss HIV outbreak in Senate lawmaker to let Democrats omit GOP filibuster in two bills MORE
In a uniformly divided Senate, Democrats cannot afford a single deviation in passing legislation through reconciliation.
No senator has been more willing to seize that power than Sen. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), the most conservative Democrat in the House.
Manchin says the minimum wage should only be raised to $ 11 an hour, instead of the $ 15 that most of his party is pushing for, and opposed Biden’s plan to pay for infrastructure by raising the tax on companies from 21% to 28%.
He said he would oppose raising it beyond 25 percent, and left no bone on his position.
“If I don’t vote to get in, it’s not going anywhere,” he said Monday. “So we’ll have some leverage here.”
Manchin has shown that it means business. He put the key in the coffin of the White House budget director candidate Neera Dents
Neera Tanden2024 GOP White House candidates lead opposition in Biden Cabinet The White House is delaying the publication of the budget plan. Biden says the Cabinet “looks like the United States” at the first MORE meeting when he said he would not vote to confirm it.
But others catch the wind of the game and begin to raise their voices, which means it may be harder to keep the 50-member ideological group together.
His. Mark Warner
Mark Robert WarnerLawyers Fight Capitol Security After Last Attack Senate Democrats Reveal Hillicon Valley International Tax Plan: Parler Says He Alerted FBI Warning Before Capitol Revolt Warner pressures Zuckerberg to deal with vaccine misinformation on Facebook, Instagram | U.S. schools are increasingly resuming MORE face-to-face learning (D-Va.), A centrist, also said significant changes would be needed for Biden to approve his infrastructure plan, while the senator progressive. Ron Wyden
Ronald (Ron) Lee Wyden: A Senate MP to Let Democrats Avoid GOP Filibusterism on Two More Bills Senate Democrats Present International Fiscal Plan Are You Worried About China? Make it easier to get more information elsewhere (D-Ore.), Who heads the Finance Committee, drew up his own version of the legislation on international corporate taxation that took a slightly different approach from what Biden outlined.
It disassociates the legislative calendar from the budgets
Because the filibuster solution is included in the budget resolution, the timetable for passing the legislation was somewhat tied to the regular credit process to fund the government.
The conciliation bill originates in the same budget resolution that establishes the general levels of expenditure for the following fiscal years, delimiting how much should be spent on defense and non-defense priorities.
This complicated the timetable for approving conciliation bills, as general spending levels for the year would have to be agreed before the budget could be approved.
It would be a tough climb. Biden has not yet proposed its own overhead figures for next year, which all other incoming administrations have done in mid-March. His budget office indicated that the figures would be released in the last week of March, only to delay its release.
Once the global budget figures are agreed, Congress must go through the lengthy process of passing 12 separate spending bills (with a 60-vote threshold in the Senate that will require Republican Party support) on Sept. 30. , when the fiscal year ends or face a possible closure.
But the parliamentarian’s decision that Congress can amend the resolution means the two are no longer united, removing an obstacle from the calendar or at least eliminating the need for other complicated solutions.
Eliminates debt ceiling pressure
A potentially catastrophic limitation that has bothered Washington, and Democrats in particular, during previous administrations has been the debt limit or the debt limit.
Even after Congress approves its spending and tax policies, setting deficits and borrowing requirements, the Treasury Department is legally prohibited from borrowing beyond a certain limit.
If Congress does not act to suspend or raise that limit when debt faces it, the country would default on its debt, which could lead to a global financial crisis.
Republicans have repeatedly used the debt ceiling as a bargaining chip, especially in 2011, when he was then president. John Boehner
John Andrew Boehner MSNBC Host: Boehner seeks “crazy” GOP is now “too late” Sean Hannity responds to former President Boehner: “What about all John’s crying?” Boehner on Bachmann: Right-wing media turned MORE into “people who used to be marginal characters in powerful media stars” (R-Ohio) insisted on an agreement to limit spending in order to increase the debt limit, leading to a ten-year plan to limit spending that Congress proceeded to cancel annually.
But in good news for Democrats, Congress can raise the debt limit through a budget reconciliation bill.
The current suspension of the debt limit ends in August. The Treasury Department may gain a few extra weeks of time through internal “extraordinary measures,” but ultimately Democrats would have had to wrap up their infrastructure bill by then or find themselves negotiating with Republicans to increase the limit.
Democrats had pondered whether they could simply create separate reconciliation accounts in the three areas governed by the process: spending, taxes, and the debt limit.
The MP’s ruling means they no longer have to worry about this approach, nor about how the debt ceiling momentum plays out in their infrastructure plans.