WASHINGTON – The House overwhelmingly passed a $ 741 billion defense policy bill on Tuesday that would remove the federation’s names from US military bases, defying President Trump’s veto threat and move lawmakers one step ahead of a confrontation in his final weeks in office. 335-78 Bipartisan votes to approve legislation recognizing pay rises for U.S. troops It reflected confidence among lawmakers in both parties that Congress could be forced to implement the bill over Trump’s objections. His presidency. This margin has been surpassed by a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate. There was a significant break from the president by the Republicans, who pushed the critical bill to its tracks. Trump refused to postpone Trump’s will. Time ends at the White House. “Today the House sent a strong, bipartisan message to the American people: Our service members and our national security are more important than politics,” said Adam Smith, Washington’s Democrat leader and leader. Of the Armed Services Committee. Congress has succeeded in passing a military bill every year for 60 years, and lawmakers on both parties have delighted with national security issues and the opportunity to strengthen support for the military. But Mr. Trump’s objections have threatened to uplift that tradition because he has warned since the summer that he would veto the bill. He first did so by order – widely supported by legislators in both chambers, as well as the Pentagon – where the Department of Defense removes the names of Confederates from military bases. Most recently, Mr. Trump has shifted the focus of his threat, demanding that the bill repeal the legal shield for social media companies unrelated. “I hope the House Republicans will vote against the very weak National Security Accreditation Act (NDAA) and I will veto it,” he said. Trump voted on Twitter on Tuesday. “Section 230 (for national security purposes) must be stopped, our national monuments must be protected, and foreign countries must be allowed to reduce 5G and troops!” All but 40 Republicans – who each oppose the Security Bill each year on policy – ignored that appeal. The military bill should include a major setback of legal protections for social media companies. Trump’s demand for delay has divided his party. Some Republican leaders have said the move is unacceptable and personally unjustified. Oklahoma Senator James M. Snyder, chairman of the Armed Services Committee. Bill. But when California Republican and minority leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy said he supported the move on Tuesday, he told reporters he would not vote to violate a final veto, an attempt by members of the president’s own party not to join. “Section 230 must be done,” Mr. McCarthy cites the abolition of legal liability for social media companies. Senior lawmakers who shepherd the law, mobilize a veto-supporting majority in support of it. Trump to sign bill. But they personally acknowledged that the president’s mercenary nature made it difficult to predict what he might do. Mr. The absolute will of the Republican leaders to clear up Trump’s objections – initially after working for several weeks to accommodate them – was that the president usually received Capitol Hill from his own party. Mr. to stop national security action on a social media arrangement that has nothing to do with it. This underscores the impatience of lawmakers in Trump’s efforts. “No matter how important this issue is, it comes out of the jurisdiction of this bill and is its own domain and separate referendum,” said Dan Bacon, a representative of the Nebraska Republican and Armed Services Committee. “Do you think the best bill will be available in two months? The answer is no.” This includes measures put forward by Democrats to prevent certain provocations during his tenure: Elliott L. Engel, a Democrat and chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee in New York, has now voted in favor of Trump’s planned withdrawal of US troops from Germany and Afghanistan. And it will be difficult for the president to station troops on the southern border that will do more to force the president to impose new sanctions against Turkey over its purchase of the Russian anti-aircraft missile system. And language include lawmakers, despite the persuasion of lawmakers in both parties. Protests for racial justice were sparked over the summer by the killing of black Americans, including George Floyd, at the hands of police. All federal officials who exercise crowd control over demonstrations and demonstrations must identify themselves and their organizations. It includes a two-party move by the Pentagon to begin the process of renaming the military bases named after an organized coalition of Democrats who have struggled to keep up with the bill. “We can’t ask today’s young service women and men to defend our country, to train those who betrayed our country in enslavement to enslave others, and to train them and their families on the platforms,” said Anthony G., a Democrat in Maryland. Said Brown and one of the supporters of the arrangement. “America’s glorious achievements are defined by the men and women who expanded the promise of freedom. That is history, and we have to respect it.” Attempting to overwrite.
Source