How does the iPhone 13, Mini, Pro and Max compare to rivals Android and against the iPhone 12

Apple has announced its new iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Mini, iPhone 13 Pro and iPhone 13 Pro Max, which include better cameras, 120 Hz screens, new processors (which Apple claims are the fastest on a phone, period), better battery life and smaller notches compared to its predecessors. But do you have to upgrade from the iPhone 12 and Apple outperforms the Android competition? The following explains how Apple uses Samsung, OnePlus, Google, and their own previous devices on paper.

One thing to keep in mind before diving into us is that the specs don’t tell the whole story. There are the obvious and difficult comparisons (how you can stack an Apple A15 chip with a Snapdragon 888 and how you can compare traditional phones to folding ones), as well as the little details that don’t fit neatly into a spec sheet. For example, one of Apple’s professional features is the ability to shoot 4K ProRes on its high-end phones, except for models with 128GB of storage, which will be limited to 1080p ProRes.

Also missing is an obvious competitor: Google’s Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro. Google did not provide us with their full specifications in their partial ad, which makes it difficult to include them in a spec comparison.

But let’s put all these warnings aside, because you might be looking for a phone Right Now. How do you stack the iPhone 13 and 13 Mini, specific by specifications, against your Android competitors? By the way, the prices in this comparison are for unlocked iPhones, which are $ 30 more than the carrier versions.

Anyway, let’s stop talking about saving a few bucks and blow the budget a bit: how does the iPhone 13 Pro deal with Android’s flagships, in a battle of more than $ 1,000 phones?

As in recent years, we see that Apple does not necessarily play a specific game, especially when it comes to cameras. Some of its high-end Android competitors have a megapixel count that is four or even nearly ten times higher than Apple cameras. Whether this will give them an advantage or not will have to be seen when we test Apple’s “dramatically more powerful” cameras. Both Apple and Google have traditionally prioritized larger pixels for low-light performance rather than raw resolution.

Finally, let’s take a look at how Apple went year after year when it came to updating its specifications. Needless to say, even though we’ve included the 12 Pro, you can’t actually buy this phone from Apple anymore, which makes the comparison more useful for upgrades than for cross-buyers.

An interesting point is that the phones have not changed in terms of screen width, height or size, but they have become a bit thicker and a bit heavier. However, they are packing a good amount of new technology, so it may be understandable.

What the specs don’t show, though, is the unfavorable price of the iPhone 12 – at first glance it seems like a reasonable $ 100 cheaper purchase, but at that price you only get half the storage. If you get a 128GB iPhone 12, you only save $ 50 compared to the 128GB iPhone 13, which includes all the updates to the screens, cameras, battery life and everything Apple announced on Tuesday. Of course, it’s technically less expensive, but you’d give up a lot on making very few savings.