From illusion to chaos, the Mexican Football League, which sought to be an alternative to the MX League ends his season with a disfigured face, just 3 of 16 teams, but still hopes to make a second campaign, say its president, Victor Montiel.
In an interview with Half time, The manager acknowledged that they did not have to start the season last September because many teams still did not have the necessary organization and infrastructure, And even revealed that one of the aspirants to participate tried to do so with a forged registration.
This was just one of the details accumulated over the past few months, in which there were dozens of public complaints of charges by players, warnings of demands from workers of the LBM towards the board and very little sporting value for this competition not affiliated with the Mexican Federation of Soccer.
“At the moment you believe in employers because they do the negotiations and they all blame us us but we had a salary cap and when they can’t pay they throw the blame on the League and that could be a mistake and this caused internal problems and they show that we are to blame, but the employers did not see their financial capacity to solve it “, he explained Montiel.
“We trust all the people to provide time because they did their structure and as they did it the time came on and by a bad decision it was decided to start the league instead of doing it when they were already well structured; now in the second tournament we have to be aware that if there is nothing clear we will not be able to start “.
Cremonese WANT to disappoint the FOOTBALL LEAGUE
The first problem facing the Football League was to remove the invitation to the football team Cremonese Xalapa, Team that assured would file the Italian Riccardo Montolivo and that they did not accept his affiliation because his registration payment was not true.
“This payment was never made, was counterfeited and then we take letters in the matter to track the payment and the voucher was forged; this was fabricated to the detriment of the league because even in this bank there was not even Box 6, which was where the payment was supposedly made, ”he revealed Montiel.
The leader explained that the different positions of the teams led the league to also have some financial problems, with the referees, For example.
“It’s an issue that can’t be hidden, we planned the league to be successful and in the end the league is still working. The teams were sacked due to lack of liquidity and that led us all to have some charges. , as with referees, and that it made us make decisions to ask teams to unsubscribe and now there are only the teams that did manage to solve it and now we are restructuring. “
PROMISE GUARANTEES TO NEW INVESTORS
Despite the many failures, the body intends to make a restructuring that gives guarantees to employers who want to have a team in the second tournament of competition.
“We’re going to improve some situations so that it takes a turn and employers have that trust, that’s a mutual fault, they sought higher salaries and it got out of hand, sponsors were also lacking”.
ERROR IN CONSTITUTIONAL ACT triggered CLAIMS
In addition to employee lawsuits against Montiel, Former Shark Club president Diego Bartolotta sued the League for fraud; in the face of that, Montiel he assured that this is due to the fact that there is an error in the constitutive act of the league and that from this they seek to blame him for different matters.
“We broke off relationship (with Bartolotta) on a previous date when the partners were in a memorandum of association with which neck was worked and in which they are proclaiming what the league is,” he stated.
“When we broke we already had the articles of incorporation that in the end had an error and this error is of the Notary and therefore the record does not serve; partners claim other things that are not and I can prove the issue of error. “
HE WILL LOOK FOR A NEW PRESIDENT
Before the exit of Carlos Salcido of the presidency of the League, Montiel will begin the search for a new character to fill this position.
“We finished really well. He’s a good guy, honest and hardworking with good ideas and we’re grateful to him.”
(…)
(…)