a federal judge will analyze the legality of the measure justified pre-trial detention imposed on the television host, Laura Bozzo, against whom weighs one apprehension order for the crime of unfaithful depositary.
Although he got one temporary suspension, the measure does not protect it from the capture order issued against him.
The driver, of Peruvian nationality, filed a lawsuit in which she demanded the pre-trial detention imposed by a control judge on August 11, who linked her to trial for the aforementioned crime, and the possible issuance of an arrest warrant against him.
That, because when Bozzo was bound to process the judge gave 48 hours him to appear voluntarily to the penitentiary of Santiaguito in the State of Mexico to intern and to fulfill the imposed preventive prison.
Because at the time of filing his lawsuit there was no arrest warrant against him Bozzo, The Ninth District Judge in Matters of Amparo and Federal Trials in the State of Mexico rejected his request on this claim.
“The act claimed, so far does not constitute an act of inconvenience, as it is future and uncertain, since, on the one hand, the arrest warrant intended to be claimed has not been issued, and on the other, the its issuance, in any case, depends on the performance or non-compliance that the direct aggravated perform with respect to the previously mentioned order, therefore, it is clear that the act under study, on the one hand does not yet exist, and in case to formulate this only results from the action of the impetrant, and not as an immediate consequence of the determination itself, that is to say, its existence is conditioned to that the forced one fulfills or not with what it requires, as well as that the authority decides to carry out the order “, the judge specified.
Meanwhile, he admitted it to analyze whether the justified measure of pre-trial detention should be imposed in accordance with law, so that on September 21 a constitutional hearing will take place to determine whether or not to grant protection.
The driver requested a temporary suspension against voluntary internment which was ordered by the control judge.
The shelter judge granted her the measure so that she would not be obliged to comply with voluntary internment, but for this she imposed as requirements the display of a guarantee for 300 thousand pesos, to appear at all diligence that is required and deliver your passport to prevent your departure from the country, given that you have the means to do so.
“This last measure of assurance, given the notoriety of the direct complainant, the means in which it is developed and the various nationalities it holds, which is a notorious fact for this Court in terms of the provisions of article 88 of the ‘Federal Code of Civil Procedure, of supplementary application to the Law of Protection, in the case of a public figure, so it is considered a justified and sufficient measure to ensure his appearance in the procedure of origin, since it is considered that it can count on the means to leave the country “, it has specified the judge.
However, the suspension was issued after Laura Bozzo failed to comply with the control judge’s request and the arrest warrant was issued against her by which the Attorney General’s Office (FGR) requested tender a red card to Interpol.
Consequently, the suspension no longer protects it against this capture order.
Read more: Alfredo Adame offers 100,000 pesos reward for Laura Bozzo
death