Dear President Trump
We are writing to you today to ask you to forgive an innocent man: Keith Raniere.
Like you, Keith Raniere has been an atrocious victim of the fake media and the Department of (In) Justice. While there are no charges of violence, weapons or drugs, Democrat-appointed judge Nicholas G. Garaufis sentenced Mr. Raniere to 120 years in prison. Here are some of the horrible injustices in this case:
Sexual trafficking without sexual trafficking: A 29-year-old white actress from a wealthy family had a sexual fantasy between her and another woman, which Raniere helped facilitate. No money changed hands and it was agreed on every inch of the road. He has now been jailed for 40 years for sex trafficking based on a single sexual encounter.
Forced labor without forced labor: The same actress transcribed a few hours of video for a friend’s funeral and read some articles. She never objected to the job and seemed happy to do so. He also had access to and used up to $ 10,000 in cash from Raniere, which he used and was therefore overpaid for his minimal desk work. He has now been in prison for 40 years for forced labor.
Manipulated evidence in FBI custody: Can the FBI ever lie or deceive? The focus of the case against Raniere was an invented possession of child pornography: nude photos of a girl who was allegedly 15 years old at the time. The FBI expert witness admitted during questioning that one of the devices containing the images was accessed and altered by an unknown person while in the custody of the FBI. Both devices were obtained through illegal registration and confiscation and multiple experts corroborate that they were manipulated.
The judge dismissed the main collaborating witness when he began to cry: Judge Garaufis surprisingly stopped the interrogation of key witness Lauren Salzman just before she was about to contradict the allegations made in her guilty plea, which Garaufis accepted before trial.
Garaufis remarkably said, “before I am a judge, I am a human being” in justifying the interruption of the critical testimony of a 40-year-old woman because she started crying. With this statement, he took off his robe and became a civilian, influenced by human emotion and therefore unable to judge impartially. He was no longer “animated justice” and became “the protective father.” Chivalry may be good, but not in a courtroom where men and women should be treated equally before the law.
Unconstitutional and unprecedented use of RICO: Laws created to prosecute the mob were used to implode a middle-class suburban community in upstate New York State with no history of violence, drugs, weapons, or criminal activity of any kind.
The prosecution intimidated potential witnesses: Using RICO as his sword, the prosecution systematically threatened to charge anyone who did not comply or did not wish to testify for the defense or speak publicly about anything that contradicted the Department of Justice’s false, highly biased, and prefabricated narrative. .
Obviously false, “False imprisonment”: an adult woman, ‘Daniela’, with a history of pathological lies, cheating and stealing money from family and friends, claimed she was ‘forced’ to stay (without paying rent) in her open room at the his father’s house for 22 months and, incredibly, he blamed Raniere. Raniere believed she had serious mental and emotional problems and tried to help the family find a way to help her recover through reflection and contemplation. At any time she was free to leave the room and it was her parents, not Raniere, who made every effort to make it easy for her daughter to stay in her room. She was the same woman who decided to stay month after month as an act of stubborn defiance to her parents and friends.
The judge lets women “lie” using names or nicknames: Judge Garaufis allowed the women witnesses in the prosecution to testify with a nickname or just the name and, in essence, assured them that they could lie without public scrutiny.
It was a circus show: Any woman who opposed Raniere was mentioned only by her first name. Any woman who supported Raniere was referred to the court by her first and last name. For the jury, it became a variation of Animal Farm: “One name is good, two names are bad.” There was no proven need for such anonymity and some of these women, who sought to be mentioned only by their first name, have since come out publicly, using their full names, to take advantage in the media of their alleged victimization.
The “victims” had great reason to lie: Several of the witnesses had good reason to lie to cover up their own crimes, including illegal entry into the country, hacking and theft of property with the intent to blackmail. They were all represented by the same civil lawyer in the criminal case and are now seeking a financial reward in a class action lawsuit against Raniere.
Because the prosecution granted immunity to many of the witnesses for the crimes they allegedly committed, the witnesses against Raniere made their statements match what the prosecution wanted to hear. The judge, who really should have taken off his robe and sat at the table with the prosecution, stopped questioning witnesses for hidden economic reasons.
To conclude, we quote again the innocent Keith Raniere: “Although my personal situation is unfair and inhumane, it has equally serious consequences for anyone affected by our American justice system. It is to be hoped that all people will recite the promise:” For freedom and justice for all! “
“For me, by chance, I became a nationally visible figure and immersed myself in an amplified and hateful injustice. I’m innocent, but can I be free? President Trump, it’s up to you.”
Respectfully, Keith Raniere and on his behalf, Make Justice Blind