Meghan Markle has claimed that Buckingham Palace “dictated” that her first names be deleted from Archie’s birth certificate. On Saturday, January 30, it was learned that the names “Rachel Meghan” were removed from the mother section of Archie’s birth certificate, leaving her as “Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex.”. Archie’s birth was recorded on May 17, 2019, after she was born on May 6.
Now a spokeswoman for Meghan has claimed that “the name change in public documents in 2019 was dictated by the palace”, and also claimed that for her it has been “offensive” to suggest that she had wanted to be “anonymous” in the certificate of birth of your child. It is unclear at this time exactly why the birth certificate was changed.
The spokesman told the Telegraph: “The name change in the public documents in 2019 was dictated by El Palau, as confirmed by documents from senior Palau officials. This was not requested by Meghan. , the Duchess of Sussex nor by the Duke of Sussex.
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry moved to the United States
The change sparked speculation, and former Queen’s press secretary Dickie Arbiter said, “Maybe that was an initial part of his plan.” Lady Colin Campbell, who saw the amendment, said: “It’s extraordinary and raises all sorts of questions about what the Sussex were thinking.” Months after the name change, the couple had left the royal family.
Earlier, it was revealed that it is “unlikely” that the Duchess of Sussex will accompany her husband when he returns to the UK in mid-2021. It is almost certain that the sixth in line of succession to the throne will travel alone to seeing his family for the first time since the couple bitterly resigned as members of royalty, several sources told the Daily Mail.
Connoisseurs emphasize that the couple’s plans have not yet been finalized and much depends on the pandemic and whether travel restrictions remain in place at the time. But his understanding, at this point, is that Harry will be flying to the UK to see the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William, along with his niece and nephews, without Meghan and probably her son Archie. Sources claimed that Meghan’s tentative decision not to accompany her husband is for “personal and practical” reasons and is in no way interpreted as “contempt”.