“Now and for years to come, we won’t get anywhere if we keep this filibuster in place,” CNN’s Dana Bash told the Minnesota Democrat, who has previously been opposed to ending the filibuster to address issues such as voting rights and climate change. Sunday “State of the Union”.
“I don’t think we should use an archaic rule that allows us to put our heads in the sand (to use the words of Justice (Sonia) Sotomayor) to put our heads in the sand and not take action on important issues. “. Klobuchar said, calling Texas law and the Supreme Court response “an assault on women’s health.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said last week that the House would take legislative action when the House returns from recess and “introduced Congresswoman Judy Chu’s Women’s Health Protection Act to include in the law l ‘Reproductive Health Care for All American Women.’ But even if a bill is passed on the issue in the House, it is likely to face obstacles in the Senate, where Democrats have a narrow majority and 60 votes are needed to break the filibuster. There is no indication that 10 Republican senators sided with them on the issue.
Last week, on a midnight order, the high court denied a request by Texas abortion providers to stop state law banning abortions after six weeks despite violating Roe v. Wade, an opinion from 1973 legalizing abortion nationwide before its viability. Texas law, which is one of the strictest in the country, has sparked outrage among Democrats and has raised concerns that the Supreme Court could overturn or lower the usual decision.
“This decision they made with the state of Texas is amazing,” Klobuchar said. “Here you have them this year, this week, basically to tell Texas women that 85% of them seeking abortion services can’t exercise their constitutional rights … And it basically gave the green light to a law which is blatantly against Roe against Wade “.
Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy, a Republican, said Sunday that the reaction to the Supreme Court decision on Texas law is being used by Democrats for political theater to “distract” other party issues.
“People are using it to raise their base to distract themselves from the disastrous policies in Afghanistan, perhaps for fundraising appeals,” Cassidy said in an interview with ABC’s “This Week.” “If it’s as terrible as people say, it will be destroyed by the Supreme Court, but acting like that is an assault on Roe v. Wade is again something the president does to distract himself from his other issues.”
Calls to change the high court
The Supreme Court decision has also renewed calls to reform the composition of the high court and for the removal of Liberal Judge Stephen Breyer, including Klobuchar, who reiterated his stance that he should do so “sooner rather than later.”
“I think if you seriously consider retirement and have said you would do so based not only on your own health, but also on the future of the court, if that decision doesn’t cry out for that, don’t ‘I don’t know what to do.’ he also added that he supports the incorporation of more seats in the Supreme Court, but that he does not believe the current composition “will change at any time in the near future”.
Democratic Rep. Veronica Escobar of Texas said Sunday that people are “shocked, horrified, outraged” by her state by the law and said she supports the Supreme Court’s expansion.
“I think we also need to expand the court. We have now seen that SCOTUS was basically engaged in late-night decisions through its shadow dossier. We have turned them into an activist court. We need to restore integrity to the court, ”Escobar said. in an interview with CBS’s “Face The Nation.”
CNN’s Aaron Pellish, Nicky Robertson, Vogue’s Ariane, Daniella Diaz and Clare Foran contributed to this report.
.Source
Related
