Let’s review the qualities and disadvantages of each of the options that have appeared to take the place of Miguel Herrera in the Eagles
Miguel ‘Piojo’ Herrera is out of America, after three years at the helm of the team. The elimination against the LAFC, in the Champions League of the CONCACAF, brought about its exit and immediately candidates arise to occupy the position of the trainer who gained four titles with the azulcremas.
The names of the possible substitutes for ‘Piojo’ come from Argentina, Uruguay, Colombia, and even Spain, looking to position themselves as the coach of the most winning team in the MX League .
Antonio ‘Turco’ Mohamed
Pros
– He arrived as a replacement for Miguel Herrera in 2014 in America, so he knows the club.
– He was champion with the Eagles, so he is loved by the fans azulcrema.
– It remains in force, as the last tournament was in command of Monterrey.
cons
– Comes from a failure with Monterrey, after leading the royal team to the top.
– It is customary to ask for high school reinforcements, which are currently priceless due to the Pandemic that affects football.
– His high salary.
Robert Dante Siboldi
Pros
– Their teams are colorful and play good football, proven in their passage through Saints and the Blue Cross.
– He was already champion in the MX League and his work with young people is recognized, this could help Sebastià Córdova, Jorge Sánchez, among others.
cons
– His lack of dressing room management, one of the reasons that led to his departure from his last two clubs.
– His past in La Màquina Celeste would provoke rejection from the azulcrema fans.
Quique Setién
Pros
– Has international experience.
– He is used to the pressure of the most popular teams in a country, as he was in Barcelona.
cons
– His adventure in Barcelona ended in a scandalous way, which reduced his prestige.
– Don’t know the MX League.
Guillermo Vázquez
Pros
– Has experience in MX League teams and is considered one of the best coaches in the tournament.
– Work with basic strengths and adapt to the budget given to you by the club, to form competitive teams.
cons
– He was on the bench at the Blue Cross in the title that America took from the Celtics in 2013, surprisingly.
– His latest work with Atlético de Sant Lluís caused the coach to lose the brilliance he gained in his other teams.
Guillermo Fangs Schelotto
Pros
– The Argentine had a good step in clubs like Boca Juniors and Lanús, knows the pressure to lead a team like America.
– He has European experience, as he was in Serie A in Italy as a coach.
cons
– With the LA Galaxy he could not deliver the desired results and only won a 2019 Leagues Cup.
– His experience in the MX League is nil, as he could not come as a player and America would be his first experience in the Mexican tournament
Joan Carles Osorio
Pros
– It knows Liga MX, since it was in the Puebla and he was trainer of the Mexican Selection.
– Has international experience, being in charge of two national representatives.
cons
– His passage through the Mexican National Team eroded his image and ended in scandal his management.
– He failed in his last project, with Atlético Nacional de Colombia.
– It is criticized for its “rotations”.