Despite four years of hand in hand with his erratic foreign policy, strict tax regime and law-breaking approach, Trump has never seriously challenged his grip on party in Congress. Trump did not violate a veto, and Republicans hate to confront such a celebrity directly among GOP bases, although some of those they nominated tried to impress him behind the scenes. But now in the fall of his power and the declining days of the presidency, Trump has met his rival in the Security Hawks and Annual Security Bill. It’s been 59 years in a row that even loyal Trump supporters are watching his Twitter attacks and plotting an uprising against a president who frequently retaliates against those who break with him. They act like it’s no big deal. Sen. Kevin Kramer (RNT) argued that Congress needed to save Trump from himself. “I do not want him to be president after 59 [NDAAs], One of the vetos, ”Kramer said in an interview. “I hate that it ends after 59 in a row, considering what he has done to support the military, to rebuild the army and to sustain us.” The Republican controversy over the past four years overcoming the president is astonishing. When asked if he had any reservations about getting the presidency, Kramer said: “No. Nothing. Politics is not a part of calculation. “It’s not about going against the president,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) Said. “What he wants is very formal. But at the end of the day, there are more pluses than minus போது when you balance the shares.” The final conference report will be in the Senate when supporters of the bill, even as Joe Biden prepares to take office, realize that they are still taking a risk against Trump, who has already begun to stress the primary challenges to the GOP officials he wants. ” That is, he has a pursuit of intense loyalty. Some members of our Republican Party have always sought to side with the President, ”a Senate Republican anonymous commentator said. Trump is actively working to break this law. This is his biggest recent priority, apart from his attempt to overthrow the failed election, which has exposed paralyzed criticism from Republicans. Trump tweeted that the GOP “should vote against the very weak National Security Accreditation Act (NDAA) and I will veto it.” The White House made it official Tuesday that Republican leaders would not follow through on the veto threat, saying it was “strongly opposed” to the law and that Trump’s advisers would recommend vetoing it if it was sent to his desk. On the other hand, some of Trump’s staunchest allies on Capitol Hill were keen to use the NDAA struggle to show their loyalty to the president. The Conservative House Freedom Caucus had initially arranged a press conference on Tuesday afternoon to outline its agenda for the new Congress. But at the last minute, the group changed the journalist’s headline to focus on supporting Trump’s veto threat and calling on GOP colleagues who vowed to violate him. “We support our president. We stand with him,” said Delegate Jody Hayes (R-C.). “If he vetoes the bill, we will support his movement and the right to do so.” They are shaping it as a tactical disagreement, and they say Trump is aware that he may be rolled over. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (RW.Va.) said the new six-year term has reduced the likelihood of revenge: “I am pro-military, I belong to a pro-military state, so I do not care about that.” 40 740 billion ‘S security bill has dozens of bipartisan priorities, many of which Trump has said. It is also one of the few bills to be passed in Congress each year, prompting Democrat and Republican leaders in both chambers to confirm their intention to violate the President’s veto. Many in GOP say they would like to address Section 230, which provides legal protection for social media companies from content posted on their sites. But they say the NDAA’s national-security emphasis transcends everything else – including the opposition of their party leader. In conclusion, for Republicans, it is a choice between having a security bill and not having one; They say the latter will be catastrophic. “This is the most important national security document ever made every year,” Sen said. James Langford (R.-Okla.) Said he wiped out what he considered to be the greatest victories not only for the country but especially for his state in this bill. “It’s very effective.” He added: “[Trump’s] Not wrong. Something has to be done in Section 230. That is the challenge here. “But Trump may be right that the only way to provoke legal changes for technology companies is to try to force Congress. There is no consensus in Congress on a complete bill; If it had, it would have already passed. So some Republicans are listening to his arguments that enough people in the GOP are willing to hold the presidency and force his presidency to be violated by the first and last veto. “The president has a point,” Sen said undecided. John Kennedy (R-La.) Said. “Mark my words: 230 years from now we will still have investigations.” Melanie Sanona contributed to this report.
Source