Saudi Arabia to host first F1 F1 Award, but human rights abuses overshadow the country’s global sporting ambitions

With light reasons, drivers will find a circuit of more than six kilometers long that runs along the picturesque promenade of the city, with 27 corners and an average speed of about 252 km / h. At 50 laps, the distance of the race will measure about 309 km (192 miles), according to the website.

“Formula 1 has a lot of fans in Saudi Arabia,” he said.

The first GP of Saudi Arabia is one of the few F1 races located in the Persian Gulf, next to Bahrain and Abu Dhabi.

“[We] “Don’t be afraid that we will compete with other countries in the region,” Al Faisal said. “We see it as we all complement each other.”

“Sports washing”

But as Saudi Arabia emerges as a powerful party involved in world sport, the country’s human rights record is being criticized.

In 2020, after the Public Investment Fund, funded by the consortium with Saudi Arabia, made an offer, along with two other parties, to buy English Premier League football club Newcastle United, activists accused the realm of “sports washing”, a phenomenon by which corrupt or autocratic regimes invest in sporting events to whitewash their international reputation. The consortium, including the Saudi PIF, ended up withdrawing its bid in July 2020, citing the protracted process and global uncertainty.

Earlier this year, human rights group Grant Liberty estimated that Saudi Arabia has spent about $ 1.5 billion on “sports laundering” since Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman launched its Vision 2030 master plan. which aims to reduce the country’s dependence on oil exports.

According to the Grant Liberty 2021 report, the country has spent millions on hosting a large number of prestigious sporting events such as golf tournaments, horse racing, billiards and chess.

Although F1 drivers have not yet spoken out against Saudi Arabia’s ten-year deal worth $ 650 million, they have previously questioned where the races are being held, especially Bahrain. .

Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton, who uses his platform to highlight social justice and racial equality, said human rights abuses occurring at various F1 sites "it is a consistent and massive problem."
Ahead of the Bahrain Grand Prix at the end of the 2020 season, Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton, who uses his platform to highlight social justice and racial equality, said human rights abuses that occur in various places of F1 “are constant and massive problem”.

“We’re probably the only ones going to so many different countries, and I think as a sport we have to do more,” he added.

A Bahraini government spokesman told CNN in March that it had a “zero-tolerance policy on ill-treatment of any kind.”
Speaking to F1 championship leader Hamilton, Al Faisal said: “Really respect as a driver […] and I admire what he does.

“You have every right […] to speak “.

“I’m a big fan and we want him to come even before the race … Everyone’s opinion matters to us,” he added.

Compress dissent

Historically, political dissidents, human rights activists and women, journalists and online critics have been harassed, detained, prosecuted and imprisoned for denouncing the Saudi government, according to Amnesty International and other international human rights groups.

In December 2020, women’s rights activist Loujain al-Hathloul was sentenced to more than five years in prison on charges of harming national security, trying to change the Saudi political system and using its relations with foreign governments and groups. of rights to “pressure the Kingdom to change its laws and systems,” according to a charge sheet published by his family.

Critics said the charges had political motivation. Despite being released in February this year, a Saudi court rejected the 31-year-old’s appeal for the termination of her sentence and the lifting of her five-year travel ban.
But it is the assassination of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018 whose capture or assassination was approved by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, according to a state intelligence report Units.

In 2018, former Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir said Khashoggi’s assassination was a rogue operation that has gone wrong.

The Saudi Foreign Ministry issued a statement following the U.S. intelligence report in February, in which they made similar claims, saying the kingdom “completely rejects the negative, false and unacceptable assessment of the ‘report concerning the direction of the Kingdom and notes that the report contained inaccurate information and conclusions.’ He added that Khashoggi’s assassination was a “nasty crime and a flagrant violation of the laws and values ​​of the kingdom.”

A U.S. intelligence report concluded that the capture or assassination of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018 was approved by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who critics say puts it in place. head doctor scene is unethical.

“What happened to Jamal Khashoggi is a tragedy for us,” Al Faisal told CNN’s Davies. “The way he had been murdered was brutal and especially for me as a Saudi or from the royal family.”

“This is something that surprised us all, and especially in Saudi Arabia. We have never heard of anyone being killed or murdered,” he said.

Al Faisal added: “I know that Saudi Arabia was known about many human rights things. But to kill or kill someone, that was a shocking thing for us, especially where he was killed and how he was killed.”

“We never expected such a thing [to come] outside the Saudis, mostly […] Saudi officials, “he added.

“That doesn’t mean that’s how we do things.”

The U.S. intelligence report concluded that bin Salman approved the operation to capture or kill Khashoggi because of his “control of decision-making in the Kingdom, the direct involvement of a key adviser, and of members of Muhammad bin Salman’s protective detail in the operation, “and his” support for the use of violent measures to silence dissidents abroad, including Khashoggi. “

A “scary” history

Given the country’s human rights record, which Amnesty International called “horrific”, critics wonder whether Saudi Arabia should predict the future of Formula 1 or any other major sports franchise.
The Guardian reported that Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at Human Rights Watch, said: “Sports bodies like Formula 1 and the FIA ​​cannot ignore the fact that they and fans are being used for sports washing.” .

“It is part of a cynical strategy to distract itself from Saudi Arabia’s human rights abuses, the arrest and torture of human rights defenders and women’s rights activists,” Worden added.

“For decades, Formula 1 has worked hard [to] be a positive force everywhere, including economic, social and cultural benefits. Sports like Formula 1 have a unique position to cross borders and cultures to bring countries and communities together to share the passion and excitement of incredible competition and success, ”F1 said in a statement to CNN.

“We take our responsibilities very seriously and have made clear our position on human rights and other issues for all our partners and host countries that are committed to respecting human rights in the way they are organized and “Of course, we always have a clear view of all the places where we compete and, in the case of Saudi Arabia, we take note of the country’s evolution.”

Given Saudi Arabia's human rights record, critics wonder whether the country should be allowed to invest in major sports franchises such as Formula 1.
Last December, when asked to respond to criticism from British lawmakers that Bahrain was using the Grand Prix to “sportily wash” its human rights record, F1 chief Chase Carey told CNN that sport “was very clear about our commitment to human rights” […] on our cooperation and collaboration with our partners to improve and advance human rights issues. “

While Al Faisal acknowledges the widespread condemnation of critics, he says he is not worried that politics could overshadow the first F1 event in the country.

“Formula One […] he is smart enough to know what serves them and their reputation, and if they considered Saudi Arabia to be one of those countries, they would never have agreed to come, ”he said.

“We want people to come to Saudi Arabia and then see [with] their own eyes and then they can opine. I respect someone’s opinion, but I need to know what it is based on and what the motivation is, ”he added.

“Saudi Arabia has changed a lot for the positive. And hopefully, we will also continue to develop, open up and change our country for what is best for our people living in Saudi Arabia,” he said.

Despite Al Faisal’s prediction that political discourse will not dominate Saudi Arabia’s Grand Prix coverage, athletes have shown greater political commitment over the past year, using their platforms to shed light on social issues within their sport.

Arrive on December 5, when the race will be held, it remains to be seen whether the conversation will be just about fast cars.

.Source