The fast-food restaurant chain Subway will have to explain to a California court the composition of one of its famous sandwiches after two residents complained that the tuna which they actually use as an ingredient it is not fish, As reported by EFE.
In their lawsuit they allege that what Subway advertises as “tuna” is in fact “1 mixture of various potions which do not constitute tuna and which have been mixed to mimic their appearance “.
Such a claim, which the company has flatly denied, was made after conducting “laboratory tests that found no traces of tuna in the samples” and trying to determine what the substance is made of, said the lawyer of the l ‘accusation.
The lawsuit was filed in a California court last week but came to light after The Washington Post reported on it.
Following the uproar mounted by the news, as Subway is a very popular chain in the United States with a presence in other countries, a company spokesman called the allegations “unfounded.”
“It simply came to our notice then there is no truth in the allegations of the complaint that was filed in California. Subway delivers 100% cooked tuna to its restaurants, which is mixed with mayonnaise and used in freshly made sandwiches, ‘wraps’ and salads that our customers enjoy, ”the company said in a statement.
In addition, the company considered that the complaint will negatively affect the franchised premises of the sandwich chain and the small owners of each business.
You may be interested
However, the lawyer who filed the lawsuit, Alex Brown, insists that no Subway official specified the composition of the ingredient when they were contacted to ask “what they were selling.” not finding traces of “tuna nor fish protein “.
It’s not the first time a Subway ingredient has been questioned, as in October the Supreme Court of Ireland ruled that the bread on its menus could not be considered “technically bread” because of its high sugar content. .