WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday said it will not consider a lawsuit filed by Texas seeking to overturn Joe Biden’s election victory in four warring states. The court ruled that Texas has no legal right to challenge how other states conduct their elections, thus not standing up to prosecution. The case attracted the support of President Trump and was approved by many Republicans in Congress, which suffered from a number of legal and factual shortcomings. President Donald Trump called the case “big,” and 126 of the 196 Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives urged the court that Trump campaign supporters see the Texas case as the best hope to block Joe Biden’s victory before the actual presidential referendum by the Election College on Monday. No state has ever asked the court to overturn the election results of other states to do what Texas proposed. The lawsuit seeks to delay presidential ballots in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, arguing that voting procedures in those states violate their own state laws. Allowing them to cast ballots in Texas would result in “ensuring illegal elections.” “Both conservative and liberal jurists have argued that the case had a dangerous flaw because Texas does not have the authority to say it was hurt or that its own voters were affected in any way by electoral procedures in another state. Dislike is not simply harmful, and nothing in the text, history or structure of the Constitution supports Texas’ view. Other states are holding their own elections, “said Pennsylvania.” The election states that allowing other warring states to prosecute will call for lawsuits against any future federal government. ” Responded to the lawsuit. “Wisconsin held its election, and its voters chose a successful candidate for their state. Texas’ attempt to cancel the election has no legal basis or factual basis. ” It was based on the statistician’s assumption that the party’s preferences were just as accurate as they did. If my aunt had four wheels, she would be a motor car !! “Along with the court summaries of the Democratic Attorney General’s friend from four warship states, 20 states and the District of Columbia, Texas has also been waiting a long time to bring its claim to court. The Texas case failed in all four states’ courts, another point that attracted the support of the Attorney General of 16 other red states against the Texas case. One notable exception was Attorney General Dave Yost of Ohio. “Wyoming Republican Gov. Mark Gordon received 70 percent of the vote, saying he and his attorney general refused to sign the red state summary.” We hope that this case will remain unresolved as a result of a constitutional policy that states of Wyoming love, states are sovereign, and have the freedom to govern themselves. ” A single outcome has changed: John Fourier, an election legal expert at the Center for Bipartisan Policy in Washington, D.C. Includes based Judiciary and Supreme Court.
Source