Texas Senator John Corny has criticized the Supreme Court case filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton that the Supreme Court will invalidate election results in the four major war-torn states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Cornin said he did not agree with the legal principle of the case. According to Paxton’s lawsuit, local authorities changed voting policies, including the expansion of the postal ballot due to Govt-19, without the consent of state legislatures, thus violating Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, he wants the ballots of the four states to be cast, and the Republican-led legislature in each state to decide who should cast their own ballots rather than the people voting for the winner. “First of all, why should a state, even a large state like Texas, tell us about how other states manage their elections?” Corn asked senior CNN correspondent Manu Raju. “We have a widespread and scattered system. Even if we don’t like it, they may think it is unfair. They (electoral policies) are determined at the state and local level, but not nationally.” On Wednesday, Texas Senator John Cornin said Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton did not accept the legal principle behind the Supreme Court case recently filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to invalidate election results in four major warring states. In this October 22, 2020 film, Corny attends a Senate Judiciary Committee meeting on the appointment of Judge Amy Connie Barrett as Associate Judge of the U.S. Supreme Court. Hannah McKay – Pool / Getty “You know, when it comes to litigation against a state, the Supreme Court of the United States has the original jurisdiction, so you don’t have to go through normal practice,” Cornin continued. “I only read its summary and I obviously struggle to understand its legal doctrine … This is an interesting theory, but I firmly do not believe it.” So far, the Republican Attorney General of 17 red states has signed Amigas in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Tennessee, and Tennessee. Summaries, Supplementary News. Paxton’s case criticizes other states for changing their election rules without consulting the legislature, even though Texas Governor Greg Abbott did the same by voting live for a week by executive order. The attorney general of the four war states mentioned in Paxton’s case condemned his legal filing as anti-democratic and unworthy. Other legal experts have called Paxton’s case “dangerous junk” and a waste of taxpayers’ money. Paxton is currently facing a non-corruption FBI investigation. The Supreme Court has ordered the four warlord states named in the case of Paxton to respond by 3pm on Thursday. It remains to be seen whether the court will hear this case. On Tuesday, the court rejected an attempt by Pennsylvania Republicans to invalidate Pennsylvania’s popular vote and for the state legislature to elect its voters. Without any action from the Supreme Court, the voters of the Electoral College are scheduled to meet on December 14 to cast their final ballots. Thereafter, the final vote count will be approved by the US Congress on January 6 as a last-ditch effort to finalize the election results before Jan. 20. Although Republicans and President Donald Trump have claimed widespread voter fraud, 51 of the 52 fraud cases filed by the president and Trump’s re-election campaign have been dismissed or expelled from court for lack of evidence. Newsweek contacted Cornin’s office to comment.
Source