Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton of Texas declared the results of the presidential election invalid in the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, one of the four major swing states that helped secure Joe Biden’s victory against President Donald Trump. The lawsuit, filed directly in the Supreme Court, seeks to declare “illegal election results” in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan – all of which Biden won – unconstitutional. It argues that those states used the corona virus infection as an excuse to illegally change their electoral rules. Fiat or friendly cases, thus weakening the integrity of the ballot. “No electoral college vote can be“ counted by such presidential voters appointed in those states, ”the Texas High Court is told to rule. Lone Star State seeks to disenfranchise other states’ long-standing legal challenges with similar goals brought to the lower courts by Trump’s campaign d other lawyers. Those lawsuits have repeatedly failed to invalidate the votes cast in favor of Biden. Georgia’s Undersecretary of State Jordan Fuchs said in an aggressive statement shortly after Boxton’s legal action was announced that Texas’ case “claims” were “false and irresponsible.” Texas blamed. “There are 80,000 fake signatures on votes that are not in Georgia, but they did not present a single person who made it happen. That’s because it didn’t happen,” Fuchs’ statement said. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel called the lawsuit a “publicity stunt in Paxton’s office” and “under the guise of dignity.” Experts in electoral law quickly rejected the opportunity for nine Supreme Court justices to take up the case. Paul Smith, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, who has argued cases for the right to vote in the Supreme Court, said the case was “wacko.” “Pennsylvania and other states have an entire system for running in elections – that’s all,” Smith, who also serves as vice president of prosecution and strategy at the Center for Non-Partisan Campaign Law. “I don’t think the Supreme Court will be interested in this.” The professor said it would “stand” on legal grounds that Texas might be in trouble for proving that there is evidence to prosecute. “This is completely unprecedented. The idea is that one state, in the Supreme Court, will say that the votes of other states were placed in the wrong way – it never happened,” he said. “What hurts the state of Texas because Pennsylvania’s votes were given to Mr. Fiden instead of Mr. Trump? There’s no connection.” Irwin, an election legal expert at the University of California, Rick Hassan wrote against him, denying that the lawsuit was “absolutely rubbish” and that the popular legal blog and Texas were standing by, “saying nothing about how other states select voters.” Paxton wrote briefly that Texas stands because it cares about which party controls the Senate, which it says “represents the states.” “While Americans are more concerned about who gets elected president, states have a unique interest in who is elected vice president so who can vote tiebreaking in the Senate,” he wrote. “The injury is particularly severe in 2020, where a Senate majority will almost certainly equate to a vice-president’s tie-breaking vote, and, depending on the outcome of the Georgia run-off election in January, there will be an equal balance political parties,” Paxton added. The lawsuit against the four states comes at a crucial time in the process of electoral certification known as the “safe port” threshold, after which Congress is forced to accept the certified results of the states. A few days later, voters in the Electoral College cast their ballots, finalizing Biden’s victory. The case also asks the Supreme Court to extend the December 14 deadline to “allow these trials to be completed.” In most cases, the Supreme Court only hears appeals from lower courts. However, in cases between two or more states, the court has the original jurisdiction. Generally four judges must agree to hear a case. Paxton is facing criminal investigation by the FBI into allegedly trying to help a wealthy campaign donor. The Associated Press confirmed the investigation in September after seven senior lawyers at the Paxton office told authorities that Paxton was guilty of abusing his office. Seven were later fired, placed on leave or resigned, triggering a whistleblower case from many of them. . Paxton denied any wrongdoing. The case is not the first in an election to reach judges, although the court has not ruled in favor of either side. Mike Kelly, President of the Republican Party of Pennsylvania, an ally of Trump, is challenging all postal votes in the state, urging the court to annul millions of votes. Biden is expected to win 306 election college votes – 36 more than is needed to defeat Trump, who is poised to get 232 such votes. But Trump refuses to acknowledge Biden. More than a month before election day, the president is spreading various unproven conspiracy theories to show election or voter fraud that he is falsely claiming to have won the race. The president is pressuring swing-state officials to take action. Will overturn their election results. Trump has raised criticism of Georgia’s Republican Governor Brian Kemp, while angrily demanding that a special session of the Peach State Legislature be convened to appoint pro – Trump voters. Trump has personally approached Kemp and Pennsylvania House Speaker Brian Cutler. Report from the Washington Post. In November, Trump hosted a meeting of Republican legislators in Michigan for a meeting at the White House. Those lawmakers said Biden had no plans to convert voters. Ahead of the election, Trump predicted that the Supreme Court would decide the betting results, and Judge Amy Connie pressed the GOP-controlled Senate to confirm Barrett the timely bench to do so. In recent weeks, as his legal challenges have escalated, Trump has admitted that he is unlikely to overturn the results of the 2020 election in court. “Well, the problem is, it’s hard to get into the Supreme Court,” Trump told Fox News last month in his first full interview since his November 3 defeat. “I’ve got the best Supreme Court lawyers, lawyers to discuss the case, if it gets there. They said, ‘It’s very difficult to raise a case there.’ “.
Source