The Sussex “were mad at Palace’s statement,” which took away their titles when they saw Oprah

Meghan and Harry already knew she was withdrawing from their titles and sponsorships when they sat down in her “no off-limits” interview with Oprah Winfrey, as The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

But it is understood that the Sussex have been overwhelmed by the tone of the heavily worded statement in which the announcement was made on behalf of the Queen.

Sources say their shock explains at least in part the anger and pain the couple showed during the trailers posted before tonight’s CBS interview.

The Queen held several private conversations with Harry in the previous weeks in which she explained that it would be impossible for him and Meghan to maintain their sponsorships if they confirmed that they would move away from official duties.

The Sussex knew they had been stripped of their titles before the interview with Oprah (pictured)

The Sussex knew they had been stripped of their titles before the interview with Oprah (pictured)

But the statement announcing the move, released by Buckingham Palace on February 19, was potentially explosive from the royal family’s point of view and risked the kind of reaction on screen that American viewers are likely to see this year. night.

References to “a life of public service” were a particular argument for Harry, who served on two tours of Afghanistan with the British Army.

It is also believed that the couple has been upset that the queen has decided to sign her ad saying that “we are all saddened by her decision” instead of wishing them a good future.

The timing also caused outrage, as it was not until the end of this month that the couple’s decision to retire from royal duties was to be reviewed.

For her part, billionaire Oprah, a chat veteran with more than 40 years of television experience, described the show to colleagues as “the best interview she’s ever done.”

A wedding guest they barely knew

By Emily Andrews

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex extended the wedding invitation to Oprah Winfrey to include the evening reception at Frogmore House, which was attended only by her closest relatives and friends.

The chat host had been invited to the ceremony in St George’s Chapel, inside Windsor Castle, although he had apparently only met Meghan face to face once.

He is not believed to have ever met Harry in person.

All 800 guests were invited to enjoy a “wedding breakfast” in the Great Hall of Windsor Castle after the ceremony, but only 200 guests were invited to a dinner in the garden of Frogmore House that night, paid for by the prince. Carles. According to reports, Harry and Meghan split the guest list “100 each.”

It is understood that the Duchess used her quota to include Oprah in the evening invitation.

Harry left many of his old friends off the guest list, including Tom ‘Skippy’ Inskip and his wife Lara, and his half-brother Tom Parker Bowles and his half-sister Laura Lopes.

Meanwhile, Meghan included on her guest list George and Amal Clooney, Idris Elba and Channel 4 vet Noel Fitzpatrick, who had taken care of her rescue dog, Guy.

Within hours of the Buckingham Palace statement, he had been photographed aboard a plane at Santa Barbara Airport, 15 miles from the £ 11 million Sussexes mansion.

Reports suggest that Oprah had only met Meghan once before being invited to the royal wedding in May 2018, when she was described as a “friend of the couple.” They are believed to have been introduced through the American network CBS and met when Oprah met in London.

The 67-year-old said she had previously requested an interview with Meghan, but her request was rejected and the duchess reportedly told her “it wasn’t the right time”.

“I remember that conversation,” Meghan explains to Oprah in one of the trailer for the interview. They didn’t even allow me to have that conversation with you personally. There had to be people sitting.

Meghan goes on to say that now is the right time because we have the ability to make our own decisions in a way that I could not have said yes (to a prior interview request). This was not my choice.

“So as an adult who lived a truly independent life, and then I went into this construction different from what I think what people imagine it to be, it’s really liberating to have the right and the privilege to say,‘ Yes, I’m ready to talk. “

In addition to losing his military titles, Harry was also forced to relinquish his position as patron of the Rugby Football Union and Rugby Football League.

The couple had been president and vice president of the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust, an organization created by the Duke’s office in 2018 and which was expected to give them both an international role.

But these also returned to the queen, while the duchess lost her position as patron of the Association of Commonwealth Universities.

The decision also meant that Meghan was stripped of her sponsorship at the National Theater, a role the queen gave to the former actress after playing for 45 years.

After the announcement of the queen, the Susxes, clearly chopped, gave an answer shortly after. “As evidenced by their work over the past year, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex remain committed to their duty and service in the UK and around the world and have offered their continued support to organizations they have represented regardless of role. official “. he wrote.

Prince Harry, represented by James Haskell, was also forced to resign as patron of the Rugby Football Union and the Rugby Football League.

Prince Harry, represented by James Haskell, was also forced to resign as patron of the Rugby Football Union and the Rugby Football League.

‘We can all live a life of service. The service is universal. “

Commentators described the separation shooting as “insulting” and “horribly disrespectful” to the queen.

The Sussex later claimed it had been taken “out of context”.

But it was notable that, in the newly updated Archewell Foundation logo of the couple, the word “Service” appears prominently.

The couple keeps their patrons private. These include the role of Harry in Sentebale, a mental health charity, and the Invictus Games Foundation. Meghan is also a patron of Smart Works, which offers clothing and training for job interviews to women in need, and to animal charity Mayhew.

.Source