WASHINGTON – Loyalists to President Trump have blocked change meetings at some government agencies and industry civil servants and President-elect Joseph R. Several federal officials said Biden Jr.’s interim committees sometimes sit in on discussions with other organizations, such as triggering conversations. At the Environmental Protection Agency, political appointments were made by industry staff and Mr. Join in every discussion between Biden’s group, tracking conversations on climate change, scientific research and other topics. In the State Department, such drops happen on the basis that Trump appointees define them as needed. On Tuesday, Mr. Biden’s replacement team was first approved by the National Security Agency, but in the United States Agency for Global Media, the parent of the Voice of America, Trump-appointed chairman Biden refuses to cooperate with the change team, two agency officials have confirmed. Presidential change experts said the presence of political officials at agency handover meetings could be unheard of and even seen as helpful. For example, President George W. Bush worked closely with Barack Obama’s incoming group in late 2008. But to admit electoral defeat, Mr. In the wake of Trump’s denial, the actions of Trump’s nominees appeared to be a detrimental attempt to slow change, some experts said. “The rule is that political people are not involved in nuts and bolts,” said Michael E. Snyder, professor of administration at the Cardoso School of Law at Yeshiva University. Hers said. He called on the Trump administration’s clear commitment to micromanage the change process by overseeing meetings as part of its broader plan to “milk their power.” Will destabilize the new administration as much as they can. “Under the Presidential Change Act, professional employees play a key role in managing agency changes, often as unpolitical heads of the agencies they work for because they bring and view institutional knowledge of government functions. However, no clear rules or guidelines describe how this process unfolds. Mr. Mr. from the Obama administration. Thomas A., who served as the EPA, said that handing over to Trump, for example, would explicitly exclude political officials from alternative meetings. Burke said. Scientific adviser to the Obama administration at the time. “For me, it’s the equivalent of having an opposing coach sit in the room while you develop your team’s strategy,” he said. Myron Abel, a senior colleague at the rival company, led the Trump administration’s transition to the EPA. He admitted that Obama had no political appointments, but said he would like to meet with them. Regardless, meetings were held in an open-plan office space, he said. “I thought what we said and what we were talking about would be open to the political people there,” he said. Ebel said. “We never cleaned the room, there were no microphones in it,” they never said. “The Biden Transition Committee has not responded to requests for comment on the process. , About 40 federal agency review committees have conducted more than 1,000 interviews and meetings with Mr. Biden’s interim officials, who have asked federal staff and anonymous people to discuss the change because they do not have the authority to talk about the process. Severl said he felt Trump officials were intimidating employees into speaking out about it, while others described the meetings as just bad. தனர். In the Department of Education, an official said Trump appointees did not deactivate the contractions, but Mr. He described the explanations given to Biden’s groups as “shining anything controversial” and described them as “politically influential”. ”Change of President December 8, 2020, 8:14 pm In the Department published, Mr. Trump’s appointments, however, have insisted on attending some, but not all, Mr. In meetings with the industry staff of Biden’s Intermediate Group, through the process. It was not immediately clear whether doing so was seen as widely infiltrating the Foreign Office or obstructing discussions, the official, who spoke anonymously, said. However, it is not unheard of for the official to say that at least some of the diplomatic discussions, including the appointments of the outgoing administration, were unheard of, and so far, the Foreign Ministry staff have been cooperating in accommodating the demands of the Biden team. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Mr. He told department officials he was ready to meet with Biden’s alternative committee, CNN reported last week, and described the incoming administration as “smart enough” on Monday. A change from late November, Mr. He said in a Fox News interview that Biden’s foreign policy advisers “lived in an imaginary world” when they served during the Obama administration. The Biden panel was approved this week by the Security Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency, two days after the move by two close associates of the newly-appointed Pentagon Trump administration, who described it as an attempt to slow change by blocking access to the intelligence services. Susan Koff, a defense spokeswoman for the agency, said the agency sometimes called Mr. Biden’s team adds staff to the list of people requesting meetings “so we have the right materialists,” he added. Meetings of other intelligence agencies, including the organization, are expected to follow later, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday that Trump-appointed Michael Pack oversees Voice of America and other federal-funded news organizations to make records and staff available to Mr Biden’s team. At the A.I., James Hewitt, the agency’s spokesman, confirmed that political leaders would attend the meetings, and that this would happen with the blessing of Mr. Biden’s alternative committee. Biden asked the Environmental Transformation Committee if the political staff could sit on the interim calls so that they could provide any information about the company, which they are obliged to do, ”he said of Doug Benevento in a statement. “We do not know if they have any concerns about the quality of the information provided in those calls.” Lisa Brown, who served as co-director of the EPA review panel during the Obama administration, said after several weeks of Trump’s administration’s attempt to slow the change, the Biden panel had largely agreed to the terms of the work. “They want to see what they can learn rather than go in and waste time in the fight, my guess,” Ms. Brown described the arrangement as trivial and worrying. “What you have to worry about is the cold outcome for the industry staff,” he said. “You ‘re going to worry that people are not coming in full, especially when you have a president you do not agree with yet.” Erica L. Green, Laura Jacks, Julian E.. Barnes, Eric Schmidt, Michael D. Shearer and Katie Benner contributed to the reporting.
Source