Lawyers for the prosecution got him to re-examine Joao Maleck’s case
The case of Joao Maleck was reopened in the Tenth Chamber specializing in comprehensive justice for adolescents and criminal Jalisco, to refute the reparation of the damage, for the case of culpable homicide committed against Maria Fernanda Penya and Alejandro Castro in 2019, the defense of seeks to also analyze the sentence and increase it to eight years, the prosecutor’s lawyer said in a statement. ESPN Digital.
“An appeal was made against the sentence, in which to Joao he was allowed access to benefits, paying reparation for the damage and a fine, he could go home, get out of jail. The appeal was made against this and the resolution is for it to be reopened, To analyze whether or not the rights of the indirect victims, the minors and the mother of Maria Fernanda were violated, by virtue of the fact that the lady is over 60 years old and the minors were violated their guarantees, “said lawyer Anuar García Gutiérez, who is defending the prosecution, in an interview with ESPN Digital.
The lawyer clarified that in case the fixed sentence can be rebutted, will seek to increase the sentence to more than four years, in search of “Joao Maleck pay with a fair sentence”.
“A sentence where he has no benefits, I can’t talk about the maximum sentence, because he’s a first offender and his age, but if I were asked, we wouldn’t expect a sentence of less than eight years in prison,” he acknowledged.
In the next few hours it will be decided whether the sanction imposed on Joao Maleck can be refuted or only the compensation he has to pay can be analyzed., After which in December 2020 he was sentenced to three years, eight months and 15 days, in addition to payment for reparation for the damage of 422,000 450 pesos.
“In the event that we are told that it is only for the repair of the damage, for the procedural reasons we saw, we will put a shelter, because what interests him is that the penalty against Joao is aggravated, not he is interested in the economic issue and would have the right to go to federal court for them to resolve regarding the violations we find. “