President Donald Trump and a long line of his Republican supporters sought to join a lengthy Texas lawsuit on Wednesday that seeks to persuade the U.S. Supreme Court to take extraordinary action to invalidate the results of the 2020 election in the four major swing states. Twenty-four hours after the lawsuit was filed, Republican politicians from 17 states petitioned in support of Texas, as well as conservative lawyers and a panel of governors, including former Alabama Judge Roy Moore, endorsing Trump’s failed attempt to reach the Senate. Tried to join this case. Republican congressmen are also seeking to join the movement. Representative Mike Johnson emailed his colleagues Wednesday morning to support a summary of the case. “President Trump called me this morning to express his appreciation for our efforts,” Johnson wrote in an email to ABC News. “He asked me to contact all the Republican members of the House and the Senate today, and we ask that everyone join our summary.” Louisiana’s Mike Johnson’s Representative Louis Comet during a House Judiciary Committee meeting in Washington on December 12, 2019. Since his November 3 defeat, the president and his allies have faced more than 50 lawsuits in state and federal courts, sometimes with serious setbacks. On social media, Trump suggested that the Supreme Court finally give him the trial he requested. “The case that everyone is waiting for is a case involving Texas and many others. It’s very strong, all citadel med,” Trump tweeted Wednesday. Texas Leads Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has been at the forefront of the lawsuit, accusing the four warring states of improperly easing election rules and “exploiting the Govt-19 epidemic” to avoid a contest result. States – Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia – Democrat Joe Biden certified after the election that he had received their voters. “Their failure to follow the rules of the law casts a dark shadow of doubt over the outcome of the entire election,” Paxton said in a statement. “We are now asking the Supreme Court to take action to rectify this awful error.” Paxton has a history of going to court to help Trump’s agenda; A year ago he filed summonses in the U.S. Supreme Court in support of an attempt to rescind the so-called DACA Adjournment on Child Attendance, but that attempt ultimately failed. The lawsuit filed by the Republican Party of Texas against the four swing states earlier this week aims to help Trump flip the outcome of the presidential race. Trump and GOP allies are asking to join. In his motion to formally join the Texas case, Trump’s attorney John Eastman argues that the contest – certified as a Biden victory by all 50 states – is still in balance. The accompanying complaint provides a vicious and distorted portrayal of Trump’s electoral performance, repeating unsubstantiated claims – but preventing the alleged fraud case from being repeatedly rejected in dozens of post – election legal challenges. “It simply came to our notice then. [Trump] To prove that fraud had taken place, Eastman argues that it was necessary to prove that the elections were “materially deviated from what the state legislature wanted them to be.” By failing to follow the rule of law, these officials are projecting our country’s confidence in elected self – government, writes Eastman. , In person or by mail, or by ballot harvesting, or in other ways that can vary dramatically from one state to another. ”But legal experts say Trump supporters have now failed to address why the challenge has now come, as changes have been made in all four states in the run-up to the unique challenges posed by the corona virus epidemic. Their election plans the day before. They said it was not even possible for the case to be considered by the Supreme Court. Change the outcome of the presidential race. “Jigiri-Pokhari,” critics say, is a group of former Republican officials, including former Sen. John Danford, former Gov. Christine Todd Whitman and former Sen. and Gov. Lowell Weiker described the case. In support of their movement against Texas and the prosecution of the four states, the term “jigiri-pokhari” means fraud or dishonesty. The idea of the High Court hearing the case by former GOP officials is to separate the powers of the “federal and a parody”. It violates the most basic constitutional principles for this court to function as a tribunal for presidential election disputes. “Former Senator John Danford, May 5, 2017, is speaking at the Metropolitan St. Louis Bar Association. This is not the first time Trump has tried to join an election case in court. In November, he asked the judges to intervene in the Pennsylvania GOP case. The court dismissed the request, saying Texas’ case is unique in that the lower courts have not ruled in the case because inter-state legal disputes may appear in the High Court, and the judges must first decide whether to accept the case and dismiss it before considering the merits, experts say. Legal experts say a full trial or oral argument is a circumstance in which such a possibility is not possible.Professor of Electoral Law at California-Irving Law School Ringer Hassan said on his blog that “this is the worst case I have ever seen filed in the Supreme Court on an urgent basis.” The Election College is coming a week before the next president is to be elected. Historically, Supreme Court judges have shown widespread respect for states in managing their elections, and aversion to politicizing the judiciary by interfering in that process. “It’s simply insane – the idea of exchanging people’s votes with discriminating legislators is completely out of our national character, and it’s just crazy,” said R-Utah’s Sen. Mitt Romney said Wednesday. “Of course, the president has the right to challenge and reconsider the decision in court. But this attempt to disrupt the popular vote is dangerous and will destroy the cause of democracy.”
Source