Writer E. Jean-Carolyn’s lawyer told a judge who presided over his rape defamation case against Trump on Friday that President Donald Trump’s “frustration” with the judiciary was a sign of “weakness and fear.” Last month, the judiciary asked the federal government’s 2nd round of the Court of Appeals to overturn Kaplan’s decision to stay the defendant in the case, and on Thursday evening Trump’s attorney Mark Kasowitz sought to suspend proceedings with the judge and Carolyn’s attorney to discuss the next steps in the case. After the Trump team learned that a conference was planned, Trump’s lawyers called for an automatic suspension of the appeal in the civil case. Chicken claims that Trump lied and slandered her, claiming that she was instigated by money and that he raped her in a department store changing room in the 1990s. But Mats responded in a phone conference with the judge Friday morning that moving away from Trump’s legal team was the latest in a series of cynical delays. “Mr. Trump certainly wants to avoid the justice system,” Mattes said. “That frustration is a sign of weakness and fear.” In fact, Mr. Trump is very keen here, and his advice is to take the rest of the game. Whether to grant Trump’s request will weigh on Stall’s tactics. Mats noted that in addition to the various attempts to delay proceedings in the case, Mats noted that the judiciary has been waiting several months for Trump to be made a defendant, in addition, DOJ lawyers have refused to make oral arguments in that effort at the trial, Mates said, adding that Carol herself had previously hit the delays last month. Wrote on Twitter: “Long realDonaldTrump delays, he will fall. “Carol said,” My case against Donald Trump is advancing every step of the way, and Trump’s lawyers are trying to pull the case three steps back. ” I will not remain silent, and I look forward to seeing my lawyers respond to Trump’s recent attempt to deny my day in court, “he said in the statement. Carol, a former Elle journal consulting columnist and biographer of Hunter S. Thompson, filed a lawsuit in state court in Manhattan in November 2019. The lawsuit was filed in state court, where a judge handed down verdicts setting the stage for Trump’s dismissal, and was forced to provide a DNA sample to test against a dress that Carroll claimed he was wearing on the day he was raped. He said the measures should not be completely paralyzed, but suggested that Caroline’s team could temporarily suspend their efforts to seek a deposit and DNA sample from Trump.A statement after the conference On the hand, Mats reiterated Trump’s outspoken distrust of the delay, saying “someone who denies sexually abusing Ms. Carol and spoke slanderously for daring to speak out.” In September, Justice Err abruptly dropped the case to federal court in Manhattan, where he argued that Trump should be the defendant, not the defendant, because he acted as a government official or employee when the statements were made. In October, Kapil rejected the DOJ’s attempt to change himself in the Carroll case and ruled that Trump should be the defendant. “The President of the United States is not an employee of the government within the meaning of the laws relating to it,” Kaplan wrote in a 59 – page judgment released on Oct. 27 in U.S. District Court in Manhattan. “Even if he were such an employee, President Trump’s defamatory statements about Ms. Carroll would not have been subject to his employment,” Kaplan wrote. In November, the Department of Justice appealed the ruling. But the DOJ did not appear at the telecommunications conference with Kaplan on Friday – which seemed to surprise the judge. “Does the judiciary have advice on this call?” Kapil a. The agency slipped its arguments after demanding that it only meet with a bad silence. One attorney noted to the judge that the judiciary seemed to respect his ruling that his case should no longer be respected. Kabilan issued the call following Mats’ request to file a legal summary against the attempt to delay the case, to which Trump’s lawyers will be allowed to respond. Trump has a history of using a delay strategy in other legal cases. For more than a year, the President’s Manhattan District Attorney’s Office sought to obtain his tax records from an accounting firm as part of his company’s criminal investigation. Trump is currently asking the Supreme Court, which once ruled against him in that case, to block DA’s Sapona based on new arguments already rejected by the lower federal courts. The Trump organization and Eric Trump recently sought to delay the dismissal of the president’s son by the New York Attorney General’s Office as part of a civil investigation into how the company claimed the values of some real estate assets. Eric Trump asked a judge to adjourn the questioning session until after the presidential election, but that request was denied. He was fired in October. .
Source