President Trump lost key swing states on key fronts. The cases, which he claims are widespread ballot fraud, have been dismissed worldwide, most recently by the Supreme Court. On Monday, the Electoral College cast its elected majority in the House of Commons against President-elect Joseph R. Presented to Biden Jr.. But as the president continues to refuse to agree, a small group of his most loyal supporters in Congress are carrying out the final conspiracy. Mr. Challenge on the platform of the House of Representatives in early January to try to reverse Biden’s victory. Even constitutional scholars and members of the president’s own party are sure that this attempt will fail. But the accidental war on January 6 could culminate in a chaotic and deeply divisive scenario, which saw Vice President Mike Pence take over. It could push Trump to the horrible point of having to declare once he actually lost the election. Mr. Fight. It promises to shape how Trump views his basic election and present another vicious test of loyalty to Republicans, who personally believe this week’s election college referendum will be the final word on the election result. The vice president who appoints the constitution to the task of leveling the results and declaring the winner, the chapter may be particularly torture, Mr. It forces him to balance his allegiance to Trump with his constitutional obligations and his own views on his own political future. The effort was led by Mo Brooks, a Republican representative in Alabama, a backbone conservative. He has been overseeing election results in five different states, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Georgia and Wisconsin, with a number of allies in the council – where they claim to have been involved in various frauds or illegal voting. There is no evidence of voting officials and widespread irregularities. “We have a higher role under the Constitution than any state court judge, more than any federal court judge, than the Supreme Court,” he said. Brooks said in an interview. “It simply came to our notice then. This is the final verdict. “Under the provisions of the Constitution and the Electoral Statistics Act of 1887, their challenges must be submitted in writing with the signature of a senator. Wisconsin senators include Ron Johnson and Rand Paul of Kentucky. Although some of Trump’s trusted allies have indicated that they would be willing to do so, no Republican senator has yet come forward to say he or she supports such an initiative. Mr. The president praised Brooks on Twitter, but has not yet taken an open interest in the strategy. Aides say he was too focused on fighting to overturn decisions in court. Even if a senator agrees, constitutional scholars say the process is a difficult one. After an objection is heard from every member of Congress, senators and delegates will return to their rooms on the opposite side of the Capitol for a two-hour debate on whether to disqualify a state vote. Both the Democrat-controlled House and the Republican-controlled Senate must agree to throw away a state’s electoral vote – something that has not happened since the 19th century. Serious Senate Republicans – Patrick J. of Pennsylvania. Tommy, Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Mitt Romney of Utah – forcibly rejected the idea of overturning the results, and their votes went to Mr. That would be enough for Biden to win with the support of Democrats. “The January 6 meeting is going to confirm that no matter how many objections are filed and whoever signs them, they will not affect the outcome of the process,” said Edward P. Snyder, a professor of constitutional law at Ohio State University. Foley said he has written extensively on the electoral process. “We can say it with clear confidence.” But he noted that the session could have repercussions for a few more years. If even a Republican senator supports the initiative, the partisan cloud hanging over the election will be Mr. This will ensure that Biden’s presidency will be darkened in the coming years. If no one does, Mr. Despite Trump’s turmoil, the party relied on the results of the election process, and Mr. It could send a definite message to the country that Pitana was finally ready to be recognized as the right winner. Brooks is far from the first legislator to try to use the equalization process to challenge the results of a bitter election defeat. The House Democrats also made efforts in 2001, 2005 and 2017, but they were basically protests after their party’s candidate accepted defeat. What is different now is that Mr. It is a historic violation of Trump’s democratic norms and his party’s preferred endorsement. Mr. If Trump blesses the effort to challenge the numbers of Congress, he could force the Republicans to make a tough decision on whether to support the attack on the election results. Many Republicans already fear he will be punished by voters for failing to continue his campaign. Observing his own presidential election in 2024, Mr. This confusion is particularly acute for Pence. As President of the Senate, he is constitutionally appointed to open and count envelopes sent from all 50 states and announce their election results. But in examining every law and order in Washington, Mr. Because of Trump’s interest, Mr. He could insist that Pence refuse to accept that role. Either way, Mr. It will call for the final performance of the subtle dance that Pence has performed over the past four years, Mr. Trying to maintain Trump’s confidence when he obeys the law. “VP in change. The role one plays is that people never pay attention, never think, but with Donald Trump, you have to consider all the possibilities now, ”said Gregory B., an adviser to the White House under President Barack Obama. Said Craig. In 1961, Richard M. Nixon, who lost the election, oversaw the voting schedule and had to decide whether to recognize voters contesting from the new state of Hawaii. Mr. Nixon eventually made a decision that hurt his voting total, but had no effect on the final decision that John F. Kennedy won. Forty years later, after the 2000 election, Al Gore had to reject the objections of his fellow Democrats and certify the victory of George W. Bush, who won the state of Florida after the Supreme Court ordered a reconsideration in that state. Election, Mr. Mr. Pence. He has sent mixed messages about how far he is willing to go to help Trump. In the early days of change, Mr. Pence denied requests from presidential loyalists to support suspicious allegations of election fraud. But most recently, he publicly praised the failed case brought by the Attorney General of Texas to expel votes from war-torn states. Mr. Democrats said they believed Biden could not escape, but his interim committee began coordinating with Speaker Nancy Pelosi to prepare for the opportunity to sign one or more senator challenges, including minority leader New York Senator Chuck Schumer. Mr. Brooks tries to hide support. He met separately last week with about half a dozen senators, including Mike Lee of Utah, and the Conservative House Freedom Caucus. “My number one goal is to fix the worst flawed U.S. electoral system, which allows for easier voter fraud and theft,” he said. Brooks said. “One bonus to achieving that goal is that Donald Trump will officially win the Electoral College because he only did so if you counted only the legal votes of eligible U.S. citizens and excluded all illegal votes.” It is not clear how wide the coalition is and what he can build. More than 60 percent of House Republicans, including the first two party leaders, joined the legal abstract in support of the failed Texas case, asking the Supreme Court to overturn the election results. But signing the legal summary is one thing, officially competing on the House floor is another. Some Republicans, including Pennsylvania’s Rep. Scott Perry and Matt Gates, have indicated that they may support the objection. Mr. Brooks said he would talk to others who were interested. But key allies of the president who have thrown themselves into previous battles, such as Jim Jordan, the Ohio representative, or Kevin McCarthy, the House minority leader in California, have not yet been publicly acknowledged. “All eyes are on Fox News on Friday night after the Supreme Court rejected the case of Texas on January 6th. Gates said. “I suspect there will be a little bit of debate and discourse in Congress when we do the voter certification work. We still think there is evidence to consider.” Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, said he would “look at how all the legal cases change before deciding what to do” Johnson plans to hold an investigation this week into “investigating election irregularities in 2020,” in which Ken Starr, a former independent adviser, right – wing favorite, and at least two lawyers who argued election challenges for Mr. Trump began challenging the results on Jan. 6, but told reporters last week Said, “It depends on what we find.” Maggie Heberman contributed to the reporting.
Source